Answer the question
In order to leave comments, you need to log in
Answer the question
In order to leave comments, you need to log in
Do you need something like an audit, that is, for specially trained and paid people to check your code? If for small things, then codereview.stackexchange.com/
I agree with the Pull Request option. If some serious sections of the code are committed, then use the pull request, in this case, let the whole team allocate 10 minutes for code review, and comment on the request.
Usually such a service is organized within the framework of the process, the work that you have in the team and the tools that are used for this.
That is, a special status for tasks for review, a mechanism that makes people receive tasks for review along with the rest of the tasks, and stuff like that. The results of the review can be in the form of letters or comments on the tasks in those tools that are used to manage the team, or maybe this should not be documented at all - and most importantly, indicate the responsibility of the reviewer for submitting the task.
How exactly to conduct a review is determined by the rules for writing code, managing its styles, etc.
That is, I have never seen a real need to use some kind of special tool for review - and how is this possible - after all, the review process is inseparable from the other processes of team management.
Most of the mistakes that are made in the code depend on the requirements for the system, how the team agreed to do it, on the peculiarities of writing the rest of the application.
I don't see how it can be outsourced somewhere.
Didn't find what you were looking for?
Ask your questionAsk a Question
731 491 924 answers to any question