K
K
Kirill Gavrilov2019-07-02 07:51:27
React
Kirill Gavrilov, 2019-07-02 07:51:27

Is it worth using Next.js in Runet?

I have doubts about this framework from the point of view of SSR, will the site be well indexed, for example, in yandex, if it is developed on Next.js?
I decided to do a little research and check through the site The site through the eyes of a robot , how such sites developed on next.js are indexed.
The following sites were included in the study:

  • Syntaxt.fm
  • npmjs
  • material-ui.io
  • expo.io
  • codemenitor.io

Result: in most cases I get a response that the robot does not see the page or no other pages were found on the site.

Answer the question

In order to leave comments, you need to log in

3 answer(s)
D
Dmitry Sviridov, 2019-07-02
@vseriousv

Yes, it's worth it. Because otherwise Yandex, Mailru, etc. Search engines will not see the content of your site. Google will see, but it ranks SPA sites worse. I use SSR on my site with NextJS - everything is fine (I have a blog).
Ps regarding the sites that participated in the study: it is possible that SSR is configured only for certain pages there.

A
Alexey, 2019-07-02
@alexeynobody

Well, just the same, SSR allows you to solve the issue of site indexing that arises when using spa.
https://habr.com/ru/post/418619/ - not really about next.js, but about react.

A
Anton Spirin, 2019-07-02
@rockon404

I decided to do a little research and check through the site The site through the eyes of a robot, how the sites developed on next.js are indexed.

In order to see sites through the eyes of search robots, you used a third-party solution. Where is the logic? Go to the search engine you are interested in and see what is indexed there.
The same one you mentioned, material-ui.com is perfectly indexed.
SSR is used for indexing in search engines and sharing in social networks. The robot does not see the difference with a static page.

Didn't find what you were looking for?

Ask your question

Ask a Question

731 491 924 answers to any question