Answer the question
In order to leave comments, you need to log in
Is it true that the provider replaces DNS requests in my case?
I go to sites blocked by the RKN using a VPN - a common situation.
As it was before:
VPN is disabled, I go to the rutracker, I get a provider stub that hangs on some IP. I turn on the VPN, I go to the rutracker.
As it has become now:
VPN is disabled or enabled - it doesn’t matter (!), I go to the rutracker, the browser swears that the certificate is self-signed (it’s on the rutracker!), Offers to add it to the exceptions. Ok, I add and... The provider's stub hangs on the domain name of the rutracker! - "Forbidden blah blah blah."
I use DNS 8.8.8.8, I check myself for all kinds of DNS Leak Test, and I understand that I don’t use 8.8.8.8, which means that the provider replaces them.
I use DNSCrypt, turn on the VPN, go to a normal root tracker with a normal SSL certificate, and not the pseudo-root tracker that the provider is trying to slip.
In connection with what questions. Are my assumptions correct? Is it even legal to spoof DNS queries?
Answer the question
In order to leave comments, you need to log in
Didn't find what you were looking for?
Ask your questionAsk a Question
731 491 924 answers to any question