How noticeable is the difference between linux distributions?

Question

linux

Hello!
We need a server for a corporate network and a cloud, such as seafile.
That's how sophisticated an aesthete you need to be to notice the difference between a debian server and an ubuntu server?
Who do you need to be to raise holivars on the topic of init vs systemd, because you won’t notice the difference when you start it?
If I install exim on centos, what can I run into?
I was really stumped because ten people advised me on everything from Debian to SUSE Enterprise. And everyone has one thing:<<Well, this one is better>>
Please explain the main visible features of this or that linux.

Answer 1

It's simple: take the Linux that you like best, install it, search the Internet for why it is the coolest, and you can safely participate in holivars on which Linux is better

Answer 2

1) Various package managers (Debian and Ubuntu - dpkg, SUSE, RHEL - rpm). Ubuntu is noticeably fresher and noticeably more unstable. Debian is noticeably more stable, but the software is older, but the repositories are the largest. This is basically the difference between debian and ubuntu. Previously, LTS was a plus for Ubuntu, but now Debian also has it. There are some differences in the configuration and default set of packages. Plus, different splitting of files into packages, the library can be included in one package in Debian and another in Ubuntu. In practice, after a while you will see the differences yourself if you actively use it.
2) What initialization system does not care at all, everyone is switching to systemd anyway.
3) If you install exim on CentOS, you will most likely solve all problems very quickly with the help of Google, for CentOS everything has already been sorted out and sucked on the forums a hundred times.
IMHO better choose CentOS for a corporate network, it is closest to the world standard - Red Hat (SLES is more popular in Europe, in the states it does not compete with Red Hat at all), plus it is relatively fresh and stable.

Answer 3

The difference is only imperceptible to those who use the computer as a typewriter or game console.
If you work, the difference is noticeable. Here all sorts of bubunts are immediately dismissed as too hemorrhoids. The simpler the system, the better. Therefore, Genta is the most correct choice.

Answer 4

As such, there is no difference between distributions. This is in general.
The difference is in some commands, in different locations of configuration and system files, and, as already noted above, in package managers, etc.
Also, some distributions do not have SELinux , although this is rare and not everyone needs it.
And so, by and large, what you like more (name, logo, past experience) then use it :)

Answer 5

What I constantly encounter is different versions of software in repositories. So fresh Centos offers stale python. My personal choice is ubuntu

Answer 6

None.

Answer 7

Suzy is good commercial support. and few holes. due to the cost of the product. other products do not promise this. and designed for straight arms. as a hat. also paid. otherwise there is no difference. only hand curvature

Answer 8

I doubt that one person can spend equal time learning different distributions and get equal experience. Because while he studies the distribution kit (several years to get used to living), and switches to another one, cardinal changes will already occur in the first one. And by the time the decision is made, everything will be different.
Take the one in which you personally find it more useful.
Here the choice is divided between "I've been working with this distribution for a long time and can easily set up and troubleshoot in case of emergency" and "I want to try to master a new distribution, and this one seems to me a good choice to expand my experience, but in case of troubleshooting it will take longer to google".

Answer 9

There are only three major main branches: Debian, RedHat, and Slackware. Plus one new one: NixOS. Everything else is their descendants and really does not differ much. Something more dynamic and fresher (Ubuntu, Fedora), and something more stable (usually the "founding fathers" themselves).
In any case, this is an unimportant question. Knowing one thing, you can safely get used to another in a very short time. And it really will not be a matter of knowledge, but a matter of habit.
Tip: do not bother and work with what you are used to. All OS are quite decent.

Answer 10

Who do you need to be to raise holivars on the topic of init vs systemd, because you won’t notice the difference when you start it?

Well, systemd really starts up faster, turns off in general instantly.
And yes, for the most part there is no fundamental difference.
For Ubuntu, you can often find a solution to difficulties, more often ready-made deb packages are available (including more recent ones), but I don’t think that there will be some package for the server for another distribution that is somewhat common.
You need to put what you understand more, the rest is not so essential in essence.

Answer 11

do not be afraid, in fact, in any Linux, you can install any command interpreter, in particular bash
, in fact, if you know bash sh, it doesn’t matter to you which Unix system to use.
The difference will be so minimal that you just pick it up on the fly.

Answer 12

It is possible that the question for the TS is no longer relevant, but I'll write it off anyway.
The difference will be in the number of bugs and the stability of the distribution - this is an important fact. Package versions may also differ, for example, Debian usually lags behind in package versions, because stability is in the foreground there, but Ubuntu is ahead of Debian, but because of this there may be unpleasant surprises, but direct hands solve the issue.
Perhaps the package managers will differ, but in general the syntax of the commands is similar, and you can ask Google how and what to do in a particular distribution.
There may be differences in some directories, as well as in the level of access to some commands, well, some programs will be, depending on the installed packages.