How good is the mikrotik SXT G-2HnD or SXT HG for bridging?

Question

WiFi

Task: to build a bridge with a line of sight, a range of no more than 500m. I would like to know if anyone used SXT G-2HnD or SXT HG to create a wi-fi bridge.
For the SXT G-2HnD, the manufacturer claims a high speed of 700-900 Mbps on packets > 512 bytes. Is it really?
How secure is this solution?
How difficult is it to settle issues with Roskomnadzor? This question is probably the most relevant.

Answer 1

Roskomnadzor gave the answer: up to 40mW at a frequency of 2.4GHz, you can do anything.
Installed SXT G-2HnD. It's been stable for a month and a half now. Judging by the rstp statistics, the bridge did not fall. SXT G-2HnD case was a little disappointing, water gets into it. I had to put cellophane on top of one, the second stands behind the glass in the room. The highest speed was achieved at a power of 11dBm (which approximately corresponds to 12.5 mW - i.e. there will be no problems with the law). Speed ​​~250Mbit/s.

Answer 2

I must say right away what to expect from Wi-Fi at 500 meters of speed of 700 megabits is clearly not worth it.
Well, at least duplex is declared there, but for Wi-Fi it must be done in half, since packages go in both directions.

Answer 3

QRT-2 with 3 watts of power is cooler. =))) only with Roskomnadzor it is very difficult to resolve such an issue.

Answer 4

That mikrotik gave up to you (in terms of routers, it is certainly cool, but not for wireless networks).
Better look towards ubiquiti nanobridge m2 or nanostation.
How to fight with Roskomnadzor is a separate topic, I won’t tell you, but Google will tell you.