How bad/good is it to change companies at intervals more than once a year?

Question

Career in IT

The story is this: I worked for the same company for 2 years, it was my first job, but I got a lot of experience. I left for another company, worked for 5 months (the project is not interesting, it consists only of legacy, all solutions are crutches) and now another company is calling, where a very tasty stack + more $, and I plan to switch, which some people tell me, which is better sit in your current place for a while, because then HRs will be scared off by work experiences of 5 months (and generally less than a year). In any case, it’s very hard for me to sit and wait for time, because I really don’t want to work with legacy, and then sit to please the HRs - the solution is so-so (as for me)
The essence of the question: how bad is it to change companies every less than a year? Personally, I see advantages in this: in one company I got experience with highly loaded systems, in this company I also had experience with new tools for me, in another project I will also get experience with a new stack. Those. I get to know different stacks, and I get a lot more experience than I would get in one company.
Maybe my thoughts are wrong, I'm interested in the opinion of others

Answer 1

If you don't like it and have somewhere to go, you have to leave. You are still young, you need to gain experience and no one will pay attention to changing companies at the beginning of your career, they will look at your experience and knowledge.
Look for a company where you are interested, work should be a joy, you should want to come and go thinking about what will be done tomorrow. In such a case, professional development is taking huge steps. And in the future, at the next interview, with your knowledge you will be able to "chat" the employer, no matter how many times you changed jobs)

Answer 2

Someone says that it’s not scary, someone says that such an employee is unreliable.
It is impossible to give a definite answer to the question.

Answer 3

How often to change jobs is up to you. If you want, then change.
The fact that job hoppers can be looked askance at is true. But they may not look. Usually a set of knowledge, skills and abilities is more valued.
You can indicate that you just worked under the contract for a fixed time or honestly explain the situation. The second option is preferable.

Answer 4

In Moscow / St. Petersburg, this is a common thing when an applicant's resume contains several companies in which he has worked for less than a year. Perhaps for juniors this is bad, but for middles and above, it is not so significant. If this is a real middle, it will begin to pay for itself from the first months, and the business will not suffer heavy losses, even if it leaves within a year. Well, plus now there is a strong shortage of engineers, for many positions they are looking for people for 5-7 months, you won’t be able to choose much.

Answer 5

1. In five months, your stack experience is plus or minus zero.
2. If there is a proposal that is better in terms of technology / project / prospects, you need to leave correctly.
3. Yes, for many employers, frequent job changes are a bad sign.
It's important to understand that employers are suspicious of candidates' frequent job changes. If this is a one-time case and you can explain it beautifully, then there will be no problem. But if there are several such places or at the interview you tell me suddenly it became not interesting in six months, then you will probably be refused if there are other candidates, because they do not want to spend resources on such a windy worker.

Answer 6

Nonsense, the market is so arranged that the temple does not care, just to get a specialist