Frameworks in GWT: GWTP, MVP4G, Acris?

Question

Google

I would like to hear feedback from people who have used these frameworks.
The situation is the following. There is a small project written in GWT. When writing, no frameworks were used. At the moment, it is clear that the project will be actively developed, and therefore there is a desire to involve in the development of any of the frameworks in order to reduce the amount of code for the implementation of standard features.
I don’t know anything about the above frameworks, except that they exist) I would like to hear feedback from people who actually used them, because. I do not want to spend time studying all and then choosing the best. The need for a serious rewriting of the project, in the case of the implementation of the framework, is not scary.

Answer 1

Currently using mvp4g, pretty good I think...

Answer 2

We have been writing for 2 years on a clean gt. There are no dependencies. The customer is alive. But our project specifics are such that the main emphasis in development is on layout, custom widgets and all sorts of special effects.

Answer 3

In the current project, I use code.google.com/p/gwt-dispatch/ and native Activities&Places as an MVP replacement.
On the previous project, where GWT was older without Activities&Places, mvp4g showed itself well.

Answer 4

In one project there was a GXT, without a centralized pagination system, but there was a peculiarity that the project was a scope of 4 applications. It is convenient to develop, because Devmode works fast. Interaction between applications was at the Frame Message level.
Another project used GWTP. Conveniently, you can make full-fledged widgets with the ability to query the server and place them anywhere on any page and reuse, for example, a selection widget from a directory.
Both projects were focused on functionality, not interface chips.
mvp4g is no longer supported like, GWTP is still supported, Activities&Places are not impressed.