Answer the question
In order to leave comments, you need to log in
Does the filename of an image matter for SEO?
Which file is better " telefon-samsung-s2 .jpg" or " 785358438534 .jpg"? And does it affect at all?
Articles on SEO say that the first is better, but in practice ... I looked at many large online stores - there are practically no transliterated names for images.
Answer the question
In order to leave comments, you need to log in
The most important is the alt title! From this data, the search engine determines that the image and its relevance to the post or topic
I think that the alt attribute is more important, and what name does not matter.
Representatives of Yandex, for example, said that hundreds of parameters influence ranking (maybe thousands, I don’t remember exactly) and it is not known what ranking algorithms (based on what indicators and parameters) Matrixnet invented for itself. If it’s not difficult to make a name with a key or just a drawing that describes the theme, then it definitely won’t be worse, but it’s quite possible that it’s better
the first option is better, but the impact on search results is minimal. In the search for pictures, a little more, but also not noticeable in practice.
It's like "eat more pepper it has a lot of vitamin C, more than a lemon", just try to eat black ground pepper by weight as much as a lemon weighs, this is his whole glass. So not everything that is "good for SEO" is "good for SEO" as strange as it may sound.
ceteris paribus,
this is when the search engine could not determine what is in the picture
Didn't find what you were looking for?
Ask your questionAsk a Question
731 491 924 answers to any question