Does it make sense to distribute your cms to php for a fee?

Question

CMS

Hello.
I recently built a cms for myself to quickly create any site. And there was a desire to distribute this system for a fee. But I do not know if someone will buy. My cms is based on modules and templates. Automatically, all data from the database is picked up and can be taken by a template without any problems. I use Twig template engine and RedBean (To work with the database). There is also a simple admin page builder. If I sell, then for how much (I plan to sell according to the monthly plan)?

Answer 1

Do you have 24/7 product support? Are you a legal entity? Can you get through on the phone within 15 minutes? If not, forget about the paid subscription.
What legal responsibility are you ready to bear in case of downtime of the client's site due to errors in your code?
Can you guarantee to fix the project code within 24 hours from the occurrence of an error? Will you be able to quickly (within 2.3 days) close security holes that are constantly found in the language you use?
If you are a lone developer and your system is really good, which I am, sorry, but I doubt it, you are better off selling the project to an investor.

Answer 2

cms to quickly create any site

If it’s real for anyone, with web streaming, with a forum, with your own social network, your own banking, torrents, search engine, and easily sharded to thousands of servers - you probably have no competitors and you can immediately go to amazon / fb / google with this.
If your concept of any site is a blog with a personal account, you should not worry, no one needs your cms.

Answer 3

Just answer yourself the question: "What competitive advantages does your CMS provide compared to existing ones and are you ready to pay for them yourself?"
I would rather consider the option of distributing an open source community version and a commercial license with support and customization. If there is really something worthwhile in cms, then it will be possible to form a group of contributors and everyone will benefit from this, and if not, there will be an additional project in the resume.

Answer 4

What does she have that others don't? "I have a golden cow, but I won't show it to you, suddenly cut it up." In fact, everything can turn out to be zilch. And it's not about fucking PSR and other whistle-blowing things that can make you throw shit at you, but about what range of tasks you can close with it.

Answer 5

Let me poyuzat, I'll tell you, it's worth at least something)

Answer 6

In Russia, cms will buy only retail. And it's busy.
Not to mention that the designers are coming. And the main player in the paid cms market has a constructor inside xD

Answer 7

If it is completely written by you, without the use of third-party foreign libraries, then you can try to enter it into the register of Russian software and apply for government orders.

Answer 8

I read your comment and most of all it looks like you now have a comfortable bike for you. Let's assume he's really good.
I recommend paying attention to the monetization model of such projects as docker or october cms
. They have an open source solution and paid assembly.
They take money not for basic functionality, but for additional services (docker has private container repositories; Oktober has a mechanism for delivering private plugins through their infrastructure)
It will be easier for you to convince people to trust you and start using it, and you will have all the bonuses from the open source project.
But it will be beneficial for a large project (especially a foreign one) to use your additional services compared to raising its similar infrastructure, since, for example, the time of programmers in America is really expensive and it is more profitable to pay for a service than to do it yourself.
I followed your path using the example of my comet-server.com project ( https://github.com/CppComet/comet-server ) and at first it was paid and closed, and then open source. As a result, I gained more from uploading to open source than I lost.