Does it make sense to create a 1s server on a VM for ubuntu or is winserv 2019 better?

Question

System administration

Good afternoon!
The question is, does it make sense to create a 1c server on a VM for ubuntu OS or is winserv 2019 better?
I'm not a lot of newbies in these matters and I want advice on what is better (more correct) from the point of view of the pros.

I’ll write in more detail, we’re buying a server for 1c, and I’m thinking which OS to put there and how to implement it more competently. There will be 10 users on average, the company is not big, and is there any point in putting a 1c server in a virtual machine (if there is one under which OS Ubuntu or Win Server).
Or maybe it's better without virtual machines, just what OS is better?

Answer 1

For 10 people, by and large, don't care
. If you are a beginner, hire a specialist ...
Install the OS that you know well. For 1s, installation on a virtual machine is not recommended

Answer 2

Short answer if finances allow, install windows + ms sql server
If you have experience or a good franchisee, then you can ubuntu + postgresql
1 option is polished to perfection, allows you to carry such databases that postgres is bent, easier to administer.
Option 2, so to speak, saves on software, but specialists are needed and often they want to eat well, so do not be surprised at requests of 200 kr per month or several million for implementation

Answer 3

If you know ubuntu and postgresql, then go ahead.
Just take a fresh ubuntu build and postgresql special. assembly for 1s
Postgres did a great job of optimizing for 1s.

Answer 4

I didn’t quite understand the question, especially where the virtual machines are. Do you buy hardware and choose an OS to install on hardware? There is money - put Windows, but keep in mind that you will have to license not only Windows itself, but also MS SQL. No money - put bubuntu and postgres.
Whether to install virtual machines or not depends on whether you still have hosts, whether the backup infrastructure is established and all that.
If this is just another host, then of course put a hyper, which is everywhere and do not forget to add backups to the system.
If this is the only host - most likely the hyper is not needed. But a backup for 1C is definitely needed

Answer 5

it all depends on the competencies that will do it and serve it.
For a beginner, it's Windows, for an inquisitive beginner, Linus. both are described on the Internet.

Answer 6

Good afternoon!
I’m not a pro, but I would answer like this:
If you now have a 1C file version, 10 employees (and don’t plan to expand in the near future), the base is only a dozen other GB, the server will be used only for 1C (and it’s not expensive, which means it makes no sense to disclose its capabilities), clients work in the same local network and through the 1C clients installed on them, you do not have other servers that should work with this server in a certain way, you do not have many IT competencies, then:
you have enough OS - which can share the file base on the network and there is no point in doing something more complicated. Anything will do. The easiest way is to install any Windows, even the client's ten or seven. Share a folder with a file base and certain rights, connect clients as a network drive, set up scheduled backups (there are a lot of programs for this), think about how, where, when you will send these copies to a safe place, restrict access to the server with a firewall and everything is OK.
If the hardware is more or less powerful and at least some development in IT is planned: deploy a hypervisor on it according to your means (there are also free ones, for example proxmox), and in the hypervisor any windows as I wrote above. In the future, you will be able to improve the infrastructure and deploy other virtual servers in the hypervisor.