Answer the question
In order to leave comments, you need to log in
Answer the question
In order to leave comments, you need to log in
As some say here: there is no life on the laptops on the line.
A poppy is bought for the convenience of work.
Some need it, some don't, some don't have enough money, some get in the way of religion.
Makpuk is fast, convenient, ultra-reliable.
A MacBook is a huge 13'' screen space.
The MacBook is a convenient UNIX console without the ugly problems of Linux.
Makpuk is a system for people.
It all depends on the preference of the person. But poppies are very convenient and productive.
As for me, a programmer does not need a laptop.
The laptop is inconvenient.
Comfortable - with two monitors, a good keyboard and mouse.
A nice bonus will be performance, which is unattainable on laptop hardware.
MacBooks are bought by those who know what's inside and how the axis works. Let's leave the glamorous kitties outside the brackets, although they are also normal - there is less chance of screwing up the windows by clicking on the link. Otherwise, a programmer is not a programmer - there is no difference, only personal preferences.
Personally, I need it, I'm used to makosi and I like that it's thin and has a long battery life. If there are still options with size and survivability, then there are no more options with makos. There is also a laptop on linux as a player. In general, I do not have a stationary computer either at home or at work. But these are my personal wishes.
If most of the tools are under the tench, they are also under the makos, and then the question of personal expediency in terms of costs. Another point - poppies are relatively cheap on the secondary
Didn't find what you were looking for?
Ask your questionAsk a Question
731 491 924 answers to any question