V
V
Vitaly2018-10-27 21:41:15
Search Engine Optimization
Vitaly, 2018-10-27 21:41:15

Do you need HTTPS for static?

There is a site, completely static (html + css + js + img), where articles are published. There is no authorization, registration, protected area, payment, etc. on the site. Does it make sense, within the framework of search engine optimization, to transfer such a site to HTTPS?

Answer the question

In order to leave comments, you need to log in

5 answer(s)
O
Orkhan Hasanli, 2018-10-27
@azerphoenix

Given the latest Google trend about the benefits of indexing sites with https, it's worth it. Yes, and in general, using https has a number of advantages. You don't even have to buy a special. certificate, but use free options:
ssl4free
lets encrypt
In simpler terms, the first group of programmers argue that SSL is needed if you conduct any transactions through the site (online stores, etc.), and the second group argues that SSL is needed anyway ... Personally, I have Let's Encrypt installed on the main sites. I won’t say that I saw a huge difference in the benefits of page indexing, although I don’t care much about SEO)))
+ now browsers (in particular chrome) swear at http... and such a nuance that chrome can swear even if there is a certificate, if the attestation center is unreliable from the point of view of chrome

E
Evgeny Yudin, 2018-10-27
@RotgarSett

No, it doesn't.
Google Chrome, on the contrary, will abandon the idea of ​​marking sites as untrustworthy (according to the latest news).
Again, few users look at this (unreliability), in the absence of authorization and purchases.
And if you do not have the transfer of information, then this is not necessary for optimization.

A
Alexander Taratin, 2018-10-27
@Taraflex

It has, because the stubborn Google Chrome is going to start marking all http sites as unreliable over time.

K
ky0, 2018-10-27
@ky0

If you are ready to put up with the possibility of eavesdropping and possible traffic spoofing (for example, adding advertising) by your clients' providers, stop until browsers start marking sites without encryption with various scary icons.
Conceptually, the question is clear, but in general = adding HTTPS now takes a minimum of time and effort. Why not?

P
Puma Thailand, 2018-10-28
@opium

Has, Google has explicitly stated that it will love https sites more, and soon all non-https sites will issue security errors in chrome, the time is not far off when all sites will be https

Didn't find what you were looking for?

Ask your question

Ask a Question

731 491 924 answers to any question