Answer the question
In order to leave comments, you need to log in
Disadvantages of owning/operating IBM servers?
Disadvantages of owning / operating IBM servers
Colleagues, we are solving the issue of purchasing various servers, and apparently we will continue to live with this manufacturer.
But I would like to know what real problems you faced when operating IBM servers.
For example: Memory after 3 years cannot be found, or cannot be bought without a service contract. Firmware update only with contract.
Answer the question
In order to leave comments, you need to log in
Specify about which servers - just x86 is now sort of like Lenovo. From practice on x86 servers - in terms of service, IBM (well, now Lenovo also) has pretty good support, there is good experience in replacing both hard drives and motherboards under warranty. Moreover, they first send a replacement, and after the "repair" they provide a courier to return the faulty hardware. As for memory - after 3 years you can look at the websites of Transcend or Kingston for their memory for your server. As for updating the firmware, I don’t know, now it may have changed, but three months ago I calmly downloaded the updated firmware for the motherboard sent to replace it and updated it to the latest firmware versions. Of the minuses - only the payment of the requested IMM functionality (without an extended key - only viewing, there is no sensible control (KVM). In this regard, I like Supermicro more - everything is there at once. It’s convenient - I stuck the server into the rack a kilometer away (just kidding - in the next room) from myself, turned on the power and the grid to the necessary ports, found the IPMI address - and do whatever you want (the last server started up like that, especially since it there was no physical CD / DVD drive - I installed everything through virtual machines in KVM). Of the minuses of Supermicro - IPMI (KVM) only works with older versions of Java (not higher than 1.6) - i.e. it’s just that you don’t always steer in the browser, but the native control software has its own Java machine and works quietly. especially since there was no physical CD / DVD drive in it - I installed everything through virtual machines in KVM). Of the minuses of Supermicro - IPMI (KVM) only works with older versions of Java (not higher than 1.6) - i.e. it’s just that you don’t always steer in the browser, but the native control software has its own Java machine and works quietly. especially since there was no physical CD / DVD drive in it - I installed everything through virtual machines in KVM). Of the minuses of Supermicro - IPMI (KVM) only works with older versions of Java (not higher than 1.6) - i.e. it’s just that you don’t always steer in the browser, but the native control software has its own Java machine and works quietly.
Didn't find what you were looking for?
Ask your questionAsk a Question
731 491 924 answers to any question