T
T
TWESTET2016-07-03 05:03:13
Programming languages
TWESTET, 2016-07-03 05:03:13

Did I understand the separation of programming languages ​​correctly?

Good afternoon
To be called a programmer, but at the same time to write a calculator with hints, is stupid at least, I realized it too late and decided to start reading from a minimum about languages, what they are divided into, but then I found many sites that contradict each other.
So here are the questions, I'm interested in the answer whether I understood correctly, and if not, how correctly.
1) Are all languages ​​divided into operator and functional?
2) operators are divided into procedural and non-procedural?
3) Are there high and low procedural?
4) does assembler belong to the low level, that is, assembler is a low-level procedural language?
5) high-level languages ​​are object-oriented, procedural-oriented, then it turns out that an object-oriented language is procedural, but this is nonsense, as I understand it, these are completely different types of languages?
6) does prototype-oriented refer to high-level languages?
7) structural and procedural programming language are completely different concepts, and if so, what level of programming does the structural language belong to?
8) PHP refers to high-level languages ​​and refers to general-purpose languages, but why does Wikipedia refer to it as an object-oriented language?

Answer the question

In order to leave comments, you need to log in

2 answer(s)
R
Rou1997, 2016-07-03
@Rou1997

Calling yourself a programmer, but at the same time writing a calculator with hints, is at least stupid

This is not stupid, but absolutely true, since you are writing, it means that the programmer, even a beginner, decide for yourself, but what are "tips", if it is Google or literature, then this is absolutely normal, on the contrary, "perversion" will try to keep in mind the data that it does not need to keep and is not effective.
This is not even a "minimum" at all, on the contrary, understanding in such matters comes only with a rich practice of solving various problems in all the languages ​​\u200b\u200bmentioned, but for now you don't need it, and there's no point in talking about it, practice.

R
Rafael™, 2016-07-03
@maxminimus

https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%9F%D0%B0%D1%80%D...

Didn't find what you were looking for?

Ask your question

Ask a Question

731 491 924 answers to any question