Answer the question
In order to leave comments, you need to log in
Answer the question
In order to leave comments, you need to log in
It seems to me that they do not like it here for another reason - this CMS does not require (or gives the impression that it does not require) user qualifications, and its code and architecture is not (or gives the impression that it is not) an example to follow.
PS I tried to be as politically correct as possible :)
About Joomla since version 1.0, a negative opinion about the quality of the code has been formed here. Although now this is not at all the case, but numerous expansion curves and beginners riveting the HS from video tutorials do not allow breaking this stereotype
why immediately downvote!? or if the opinion of the minority - then immediately in the negative ... it's
a shame somehow ... :(
Well, it seems to me that Joomla should be presented in the same way as WordPress with Drupal. Just because she is from the "big three", but this is still no accident. Another thing is that I myself will not go there. As well as many already expressed here.
But if there develops its own party, which will sanely cover this very Jumla - then why not?
I completely agree with you, but the development team is actively engaged in supporting and updating the product, and at the moment, if I'm not mistaken, the latest release is 1.6.3 with bug fixes and Russian localization.
I don’t see the best option for beginners, there is just a reason to start learning PHP languages, there is an incentive to learn CSS, and developing your own projects will create a craving for the formation of dynamic and static sites, which will entail a desire for a more professional development environment.
Didn't find what you were looking for?
Ask your questionAsk a Question
731 491 924 answers to any question