Choosing an antivirus for an organization?

Question

Computer networks

The question arose of choosing an antivirus for an organization, 35 PCs and 2 servers under Win 2012R2 (a domain controller and a machine with virtual machines.)
Kaspersky with the control center suits the functionality, but some machines are heavily loaded.
Reading antivirus ratings is useless because different lists have different ratings and so on.
Advise who used what and what they decided to leave?

Answer 1

habrahabr.ru/post/101971 + prohibit the user from calling the console and settings.
Will solve most of the problems. From the rest, and anvir will not protect.

Answer 2

is there anyone who uses dr.web? for money, you will have to choose between kaspersky and dr.web.

Answer 3

At the last place of work, I got an office: a gateway on FreeBSD, a WinServ 2003 domain controller, all have user rights. And DrWeb stood everywhere. Stably eating 200 meters of RAM provided fast and reliable protection. There were many single-core machines on the network, and users did not complain about performance. There are no left processes in the task manager. In short - cars of the year did not ask for a reinstallation of Windows. The only thing is that I bought additional RAM for a couple of machines, up to two gigs. For an Internet it is quite enough. Now node32 has run out in the new office, I am migrating to DrWeb. I hate Kaspersky since childhood for willful behavior :)

Answer 4

almost all users work for me in the terminal vin2003. the terminal has kaspersky endpoint security for bussiness. no complaints. those few viruses that skip Casper catches. why I chose Casper, because it practically does not load the terminal server.
on the freebsd gate. Internet traffic is checked by drweb. and so for many years. I do not plan to change.
before that, there was node32 in the terminal (another 2 or 3 branches). missed a lot.

Answer 5

IMHO, according to tests and ratings, there are now two leaders Casper and Bit-Defender.
The beat-defender has a cool new feature, if you are interested, read on the site.
Kaspersky should not load the system if configured correctly. There are lags, cars fall off, but very rarely.

Answer 6

There is experience in setting up and operating symantec, a quite suitable antivirus, depending on how to set it up, there is both a server and a client version. I would also consider installing free antiviruses (internet security or essentials) on clients, and something purchased on servers.

Answer 7

Leaders are Kaspersky and Symantek.
I personally recently demolished Kaspersky and installed Simantek and I don’t know grief.
The admin panel is more convenient, users are happy. It slows down the system less than Kaspersky.

Answer 8

This is what I had to do, a budget organization.
Choosing an antivirus for an organization?