Choose an ultrabook?

Question

Samsung

Greetings, respected society, I just can’t decide on an ultrabook, maybe someone can tell me something.
Here's what I choose:
1. Samsung NP900X3A
pluses: good matrix with good brightness and viewing angles, keyboard backlight, very comfortable keyboard, light, thin, the whole body is made of magnesium alloy if not half the cost of an ultrabook, since it uses a 1.8 format ssd and it costs very decently), only the Latin alphabet on the keyboard is illuminated, the Cyrillic alphabet is not 2. Samsung 530U3C pluses: thin light, hhd + cache ssd, matal. case cons: average screen matrix, keyboard is not comfortable 3. Fujitsu LIFEBOOK UH572





this device has just begun to be considered, in principle, everything in it seems to be good (at an average level), but it is heavier (1.6 kg), and there is plastic inside, but the cheapest of this trio
In principle, Samsung NP900X3A looks the best, and if with if there was no backlight, I would somehow measure it, then 128GB of disk space is not enough, but in the direction of this ultrabook it pushes what a friend sells, a new one with papers for 23,000 rubles, in stores it costs more
Ultrabook is needed mainly for surfing, a little coding when there is no normal PC
Thanks!

Answer 1

I think the best of these Samsung 530s in screens, the difference will be almost invisible and ssd does not give much speed gain. But the percent is more powerful and it is lighter. By the way, did not consider asus?

Answer 2

Does the NP900X3A have a comfortable keyboard? There are also castrated arrows (where did this stupid fashion to save on arrows come from?).

yes, they are small, but I wrote for convenience in general, and Samsung 530U3C they are even smaller

Answer 3

I bought a Samsung 530 for my wife, she really likes it, but I wouldn’t take it myself, I have specific requirements.
I really don’t want to let go of the 900th series, but I’m not sure about the convenience of work.
And yes, as advised above, look at another asus, they also have a decent subnote.

Answer 4

> cons: there is only 128gb sdd (upgrading to 256 will cost almost half the cost of an ultrabook, since ssd 1.8 format is used and it costs very decently)
Judging by the autopsy of a patient in one of the reviews, there is an ordinary Msata disk. For example , here's one I put myself in Lenovo. It's not worth that much money. You can also sell the old one at 128GB :)

Answer 5

But you don't consider this one?
market.yandex.ru/model.xml?modelid=8441143&hid=91013
But if anything, I'm for the first. Increase the disk space with some device like MyBook)
Or take a larger and thicker laptop with an optical drive, the drive is a flop, and in its place is a second terabyte disk, for example. But it won't be as easy anymore. :-(

Answer 6

Lenovo Yoga 13
You can add memory and put a second ssd
Good screen
Comfortable keyboard

Answer 7

If from what you wrote, I would choose the first option. And if you expand the options, then for surfing and coding, the best Macbook Air option

Answer 8

I bought myself a Toshiba Portege Z930-DKS. Very good laptop, I recommend. Here is a brief overview.

Answer 9

An important point: the 530U3C has several options, some of which involve ssd.
IMHO: these laptops have a good price / quality ratio (from 20k), a matte screen (which, although there are more, but still limited), the possibility of painless memory / disk expansion, the absence of any critical problems with Linux.
Unambiguous disadvantages: viewing angles, pre-installed software on Windows, small problems with power management (incomprehensibly working closing of the lid, a curve checking the battery status on Linux).

Answer 10

I settled on this Asus ZenBook UX31A model. :)
But vague doubts torment me ... tell me if Asus ZenBook UX31A will have the opportunity to change the SSD to 256 GB, and will it cost half the cost of the beech, is the resolution of 1600x900 normal for such a diagonal, or is it still better than 1366x768?
Another option is to look at Asus ZenBook UX32VD (http://rozetka.com.ua/asus_ux32vd-r3001h/p243455/) it is cheaper (though I don’t understand why), but there is HHD + SSD Cache, resolution 1366x768, but from pros discrete video NVIDIA GeForce GT620M