Answer the question
In order to leave comments, you need to log in
Backup with limited file version history
Tired of searching, can you recommend software for regular backup that meets the following criteria:
1. Incremental backup, but such that the latest version of all files is centrally located in one directory - in fact, a mirror
2. Storage of no more than N previous versions of files
3. Packing everything in one
encrypted ZIP the current zip is the largest, because is a mirror, the rest are smaller, contain previous and deleted versions of files, with the timestep of the corresponding backup
4. not weigh a ton
5. scheduled execution, and by “connecting a disk”
Answer the question
In order to leave comments, you need to log in
SyncBackPro is capable of 1,2,4,5
encryption + versioning in case of packing each file into a separate archive
Encryption-versioning in case of packing into one archive
Therefore, encryption was made by third-party means
I solved this problem simply.
1. Made an S3 account on Amazon
2. Installed s3cmd from ports
3. Wrote a php script to create an incremental backup and base ... a two-week history of archives is tracked, all old ones are deleted, when synchronizing with S3, old backups are also deleted.
If you drop the 3 and the refinement, then rsnapshot (which is based on rsync ) is the perfect solution.
It's in GNU/Linux. If you have a Microsoft brainchild, then you should probably look at something else, but I'm not strong here.
take a look at rdiff-backup . As for 3, I'm not sure, 1 and 2 seem to be able to. 5, you will probably have to configure it yourself, I think the Windows scheduler can handle it.
Your point 1, together with 2, and even the 3rd, is not feasible.
What you can do:
Take Cobian Backup
Set up two tasks:
1st task - Incremental backup, taking into account the archive attribute, backup depth - as much as you need, make the archive full - as you need, I usually set it for the weekend. Those. if you need a rollback for a month -
depth 30, full archive - every 7.
2nd task - Dumb copying to one folder, without taking into account the archive attribute, without removing the archive attribute.
Target folder or partition - encrypt EFS, BitLocker, TrueCrypt in the end.
ssd is in principle a good thing - I would put the OS on one SSD big and good, on the second ssd it takes out frequently used data with fast access time - virtual machines, databases, and would store their backups on ordinary screws, better in a raid
Didn't find what you were looking for?
Ask your questionAsk a Question
731 491 924 answers to any question