Answer the question
In order to leave comments, you need to log in
Are there any reasons to use "Withdrawal" instead of "Withdrawal", and how did the former become established?
Don't you think that "Withdrawal of money" sounds somehow unusual, but at the same time it is understandable. And “Withdrawal” sounds familiar, but at the same time abstract?
How could the name "Withdrawals" become as common or more common than "Withdrawals"?
Maybe I'm the only one who thinks that money is better than means? Is it about the division into colloquial and professional vocabulary?
Answer the question
In order to leave comments, you need to log in
I think it is correct to write "Withdrawal of funds". But long phrases in the Russian language are often abbreviated, and thus in the text we get synonyms for "Withdrawal of money", "Withdrawal of funds" or even simply "Withdrawal".
In general, the task of any language is to convey the thought of one person to another. Therefore, for native speakers, both forms "Withdrawal of funds" and "Withdrawal of money" will be identical, since they carry the same semantic load.
Didn't find what you were looking for?
Ask your questionAsk a Question
731 491 924 answers to any question