Answer the question
In order to leave comments, you need to log in
Work in an IT company on a contract basis or as an individual entrepreneur?
Please answer point by point.
1) Do any of you work / worked in an IT company on a contract basis?
2) What are the pitfalls here?
3) Suppose a person cannot get a job in an IT company according to the work book. How do IT companies feel about hiring a contract worker?
4) Is it a big problem for them?
---
5) Do any of you work / worked in an IT company as an individual entrepreneur (individual entrepreneur)?
6) What are the pitfalls here?
7) Suppose a person cannot get a job in an IT company according to the work book. How do IT companies feel about hiring an employee who will work for them as an individual entrepreneur?
Answer the question
In order to leave comments, you need to log in
3) Suppose a person cannot get a job in an IT company according to the work book. How do IT companies feel about hiring a contract worker?
In terms of salary:
a black salary is worse than hiring an individual entrepreneur. Just gray and black money come from what? either from cash out, or from "empty" contracts. More often with cash. Those firms that have black cash at the entrance are small firms or balancing between cash / non-cash (which requires a good manager or accountant). But if cash came under such a scheme, it would be more convenient for them to give non-cash IP than from cash reserves. Cash always takes precedence. And if you can hire an individual entrepreneur and avoid unnecessary leftist movements. There, the difference between cashing out will be conditionally 4%. Pay 4% and live in peace. There are a lot of risks to get stuck with cashing out now.
I think now many will agree to such schemes more. But it’s only worth considering that an individual entrepreneur has an unrealistic disadvantage for the owner - you have to forget about auto / consumer loans. For banks, the owner of an IP becomes a type of "businessman", and all loans for business will be given at rates of 20% ++
Worked under a contract (GPC agreement) for several years. Know what I know now, I would not agree to work under a GPC agreement for a long time.
The company practiced a contract for interns, junior specialists and when a specialist is needed for one-time work. There are those who offer a contract for a trial period.
Under the contract, the company pays contributions to the tax and pension fund.
Of the minuses: payment under the contract will always be after the completion of work, the contract can be drawn up in different ways, usually payment is once a month in 10-30 days.
There is no paid vacation and sick leave (there are options to agree with the authorities that the vacation is included in the contract, it’s as lucky), there is no work experience and length of service in the company (it can be important if the company has bonuses for seniority), there are no bonuses for full-time employees companies (for example, voluntary medical insurance), premiums.
And the most unpleasant thing is that the contract is concluded for a short period, there will always be problems and hassle with its extension or the conclusion of a new one, signing the act is also hemorrhoids. In which case, the contractors are disposed of in the first place.
From my point of view, GPC has only one plus - there is no obligation to comply with the employer's work schedule, as they pay for the result, and not for hours. But this can lead to unpaid overtime.
Yes, this is more a question for the accounting department and their lawyer. It is unlikely that anyone has a full-time lawyer to draw up new contracts every time.
Let's say a person cannot get a job in an IT company according to the work book. I can’t even imagine for what reason a person cannot get a job, if a part-time job, then why register as an individual entrepreneur?)
In most companies, the employer puts the employee in front of the fact how he will work: with a white / gray / black salary, under an employment / contract / illegally. If you don't like it, bye.
A person must be a rare enough specialist or some kind of super-duper qualified professional for the employer to get confused for him and decide to deviate from the employment scheme established in the company.
Didn't find what you were looking for?
Ask your questionAsk a Question
731 491 924 answers to any question