F
F
FiW2011-03-30 19:59:00
Windows
FiW, 2011-03-30 19:59:00

Windows 7, SSD, where to move C:\ProgramData and C:\Users ?

Given:
- Laptop Lenovo X201i, 8GB RAM
- SSD Intel X25-M 120GB

After I tried the SSD on this laptop, I want to completely switch to it, abandoning the desktop.

Problem:
It is not possible to use both SSD and HDD in this laptop! Because there is only an SSD in the system, then there is a problem with permanent writing to C:\ProgramData and C:\Users. For example, Windows updates profiles (registry, etc.) or AVP constantly writes its own report, which cannot be turned off, slowly but surely devouring the SSD resource. I'm puzzling over where to move C:\ProgramData and C:\Users so as not to kill the SSD faster than possible. There were the following ideas:
1. transfer to a RAM disk with writing to disk and recovery, however, the problem of transferring files arises, because the transfer itself must be done in Recovery, which means there will be no RAM disk.
2. Transferring them to SDHC class 10 with SuperVolume cache and lazy writing did not work, despite the cache got terrible brakes.

In general, I like the idea of ​​a RAM disk, because. this should, in theory, further increase the performance of the system, because the cache and temporary files of the browser, etc. are stored there.

Can anyone suggest a good solution?

Answer the question

In order to leave comments, you need to log in

13 answer(s)
V
VenomBlood, 2011-03-30
@VenomBlood

Stop reinventing crutches and leave everything on the SSD. To wear out cells by 25%, you need to write 120GB * 10,000 * 0.25 = 300TB of data.
Even if you write 100GB per day, it will last for 10 years (and this is with 25% resource usage).

S
Sergey Lerg, 2011-03-30
@Lerg

www.intel.com/design/flash/nand/mainstream/index.htm
According to the specification of 1.2 million hours of MTBF, which is 140 years, maybe her concern for disk resource?
It also says that it is well suited for the seven.

These drives also feature low write amplification and a unique wear-leveling design for higher reliability, meaning Intel drives not only perform better – they last longer.

A
AlexeyK, 2011-03-30
@AlexeyK

Do not bathe, I have been sitting for a long time, there are no problems.

A
almazmusic, 2011-03-30
@almazmusic

Excuse me, but why did you buy an SSD then? To transfer everything from it? Or are you confused by the growing host-writes? So don't turn it on. Just use! And of course you need at least 8GB of RAM for the SSD.

A
AlexeyK, 2011-03-30
@AlexeyK

1 year, the disk is the same, Windows too

T
track, 2011-03-31
@track

1. Do not transfer anywhere, otherwise you will be transferred to a situation where your SSD will be disabled lying on a shelf in a safe. So what if it's useless, but it's guaranteed not to break.
2. In a properly built system, which includes Windows 7 without tweaks and without disabling UAC, they do not write to Program Files during operation. Therefore, using access to files in Program Files is the optimal use of the SSD, and the resource does not reduce it even theoretically.

A
Anton Spirin, 2011-04-01
@dude_sam

Disable the swap file and indexing - this will be more than enough.
I've been working on a ssd samsung 64Gb for 2 years already (the first year under kubuntu, the second under win7) and everything is fine.
I'm going to take a new laptop (already paid for lenovo t420) and put intel series 510 into it and not worry - the surrounding hardware will become obsolete before the disk (IMHO).

P
Puma Thailand, 2011-04-01
@opium

I've been sitting for several months since last year on the vertex ssd, I didn’t transfer anything anywhere, seven, she turned off the swap herself.
No problem. everything flies.

D
Dmitry T., 2013-11-20
@tyzhnenko

1.5 years on Win7 4% wear. Disabled only indexing, swap and everything else as it was and remains. Torrents live on the adjacent HDD.

H
homm, 2011-03-30
@homm

I agree with the two answers above. Better focus on regular backups.

A
Alexey Sidorov, 2011-03-30
@Gortauer87

Mount the partition as a folder.
man mountvol

M
MT, 2011-03-31
@MTonly

You can try to wait until the current SSD really wears out. And if this happens faster than it becomes morally obsolete, purchase a new one (the price of a 120 GB model is quite acceptable) and then take additional measures to increase the life of the SSD (a RAM disk is a completely logical solution if the OS is 64-bit and there is enough memory ).
Incidentally, the Intel SSD Toolbox should probably show an estimated remaining life based on current wear. It may be enough for you to just check her readings regularly.

L
Lazer1999, 2011-04-01
@Lazer1999

Don't you worry. I have been living on a previous generation SSD (OCZ Vertex) on a desktop with several operating systems (OS on SSD, of course) for more than 2 years. Depreciation (considering - the generation is old) - 20%. Moreover, I don’t think about anything at all, I work as it was. And all is well. Sometimes I check with fictitious scraps (every 1-2 months). Well, something like this.
The laptop is X25 120Gb. Two sections in half - for OS and for files. Again - I don’t really think about how to work - except that I transferred the torrents completely to the desktop + Winch connected to the router.
And so - Intel promises that the SSD will live for 5 years with host writes within 20 gigabytes per day. Count on the utility - if a typical host writes per day does not exceed this value - do not ask any optimization questions at all. For me, it only increased once - when I installed the OS on the laptop with all the updates and other rubbish. And with normal use - all day long coding / rest - it does not exceed 5 gigs, and most of it falls on content downloads from the network - movies, music, etc. - direct work takes much less. Unless - it became less likely to hibernate, more and more I just turn off the laptop - because it's faster, and every time N gigs of host writes does not devour.

Didn't find what you were looking for?

Ask your question

Ask a Question

731 491 924 answers to any question