D
D
d0lph1n2018-12-04 16:10:50
Mathematics
d0lph1n, 2018-12-04 16:10:50

Why MNC only for normal noise?

Why is the use of least squares for approximating time series justified only for those cases where the noise has a normal distribution?

Answer the question

In order to leave comments, you need to log in

3 answer(s)
V
Vasily Melnikov, 2018-12-04
@d0lph1n

The method will work better for the normal distribution of the deviation. it's built into it.
It is easy to show this - you can take some artificial distribution, for example, the deviation is always by a given constant c. Then the function will simply get the offset f`(x) = f(x) + c and approximated by LSM will remain so.
But if the distribution is center-weighted or uniform, then the method will work

L
longclaps, 2018-12-04
@longclaps

Bullshit.
update
Mercury13 is almost right, the only requirement is no odd moments, i.e. even distribution density.
Vasily Melnikov , accordingly, drove the blizzard away, not being able to distinguish a random error (i.e. noise) from a systematic one. It happens.
d0lph1n , having answers like this to his credit , turned out to be an off-topic charlatan . It happens, but it wouldn't be better.

K
Karpion, 2018-12-08
@Karpion

Depends on what meaning we put in the word "justified."

Didn't find what you were looking for?

Ask your question

Ask a Question

731 491 924 answers to any question