Why make a mobile version of the site?

Question

HTML

Greetings
I saw a lot of sites with a mobile version of the site. It turns out two sites - site.ru and m.site.ru. And I don't understand the meaning of this. Why not make an adaptive version of the site? Clarify please.

Answer 1

In short, you don’t need much in the mobile version, which is used in the full version of the site. With adaptive layout, you will most likely have a bunch of unnecessary "garbage" left over from the full version. Which will affect performance, increase the weight of the data that needs to be passed to the user, which in itself will increase the page load time. And as for me, maintaining 2 versions of the site is much easier, provided that there is a staff of qualified specialists. We use RESS in our projects, but this is already for large projects with a good staff of specialists.

Answer 2

Our clients often waste money on the development of an adaptive version, because it increases the project budget by 50% -100%. Then they come a year later, they ask about "make what is adaptive."
You start counting, and in fact, you need to redo everything from scratch for good, with the possible exception of prototyping and desktop layouts. The re-layout will entail a change in the house, which will entail a constriction on cms. Well, it comes out as a new project on the budget.
The client says "yes, how is it?, just make it adaptive, correct the styles" and, of course, do not agree to allocate such a budget.
Then you offer him a mobile version, because. and it’s easier to make up and the functionality is easier and the budget is not the same as for the adaptation of an existing project.

Answer 3

They don't know how to do responsive layout.
Either this is legacy, and the mobile version was made a very long time ago.

Answer 4

a paradox, but the mobile version can be both a relic, those if the site was made in shaggy years, or a conscious decision. with the first option, everything is clear, but with the second, not everything is so rosy. those yes, the developers argue this purely with love for users, concern for their traffic, etc., but to be honest, the developers are cunning. in fact, the developer, with the help of not tricky manipulations with redirects and a tambourine, gets two sites (yes, as many as you like), which are like one (the wording is not entirely accurate, google what aliases are), but physically these are not just different servers, but usually different data centers , fault tolerance is growing, it is easier to maintain, and under the sauce of taking care of the user, this is overgrown with cuteness

Answer 5

improved adaptation to the mobile version, improves search results when searching from a mobile device.

Answer 6

Ideally, the site should be responsive with a mobile version. If an adaptive site is opened on a mobile phone, it often turns into an endless footcloth with text and photos. The task of the mobile version is to give the user the information he is looking for - immediately, without forcing him to scroll the site.

Answer 7

For Python 2, at the beginning of the file, put # coding: utf8and add a symbol before the line u:

# coding: utf8

print u'Привет питон!'

The script must be saved in UTF-8 encoding. Then the text will be automatically converted to CP866 when output to the console.
Python 3 uses UTF-8 regardless of the system locale, so it coding's u''no longer needed there.

Answer 8

Or like this:
# -*- coding: utf-8 -*-