Why is PowerDNS less popular than Bind?

Question

linux

Hello. Why is Bind preferred over PowerDNS now? After all, PowerDNS has support for MySQL / PgSQL backend and HTTP API. What are the pitfalls associated with using PowerDNS?

Answer 1

For comparison, the default
ISPmanager Lite - Bind
ISPmanager Busines - PDNS only
Bind is simpler. Good for small projects.

Answer 2

I use pdns
bind by default in distros, they just put that's all.

Answer 3

I will answer for myself - I put bind:
included in the standard RHEL distribution:
does not require the installation of MySQL / PgSQL.
In my case - PowerDNS has no advantages for my particular case.