P
P
Puma Thailand2011-04-08 10:20:52
linux
Puma Thailand, 2011-04-08 10:20:52

Who achieved speed of record on samba more than 80 megabytes per second?

The second day I'm already wiser, I use zero soft raids for tests, from 4 and 8 disks, up to 300 megabytes per second pour from raid to raid.
centos 5.5 system
Tried samba 3.0 and 3.5 same results. I watched various optimizations, as
samba is not particularly optimized, not a single setting affected the upload speed. the overall speed is the same and is divided into two fills. Thinking about jumboframes, but this is not appropriate everywhere. Hardware server mother from supermicro processor i7 RAM 12 GB Network on a gigabit long switch
When filled, the top looks something like this
top - 14:19:39 up 2:27, 1 user, load average: 0.42, 0.33, 0.21
Tasks: 103 total, 1 running, 102 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie
Cpu0: 0.0% us, 0.0%sy, 0.0%ni,100.0%id, 0.0%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.0%si, 0.0%st
Cpu1: 0.0%us, 0.7%sy, 0.0%ni, 98.3%id, 0.0%wa 0.7%hi, 0.3%si, 0.0%st
Cpu2: 0.0%us, 0.0%sy, 0.0%ni, 99.3%id, 0.0%wa, 0.3%hi, 0.3%si, 0.0%st
Cpu3: 1.7%us , 6.3%sy, 0.0%ni, 66.0%id, 0.0%wa, 0.0%hi, 26.0%si, 0.0%st Mem: 12298084k
total, 12234868k used, 63216k free, 424k buffers
free, 11850924k cached
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
5215 nobody 15 0 142m 3532 2424 S 8.7 0.0 0:29.24 smbd
385 ROOT 10 -5 0 0 0 S 1.3 0.0 0: 33.28 KSWAPD0
383 ROOT 15 0 0 0 0 S 0.7 0.0 0: 22.74 PDFLUSH
3783 ROOT 15 0 90920 3432 2648 S 0.3 0.0 0: 25.99 SSHD
5223 ROOT 15 0 12744 1092 812 R 0.3 0.0 0:00.01 top
1 root 15 0 10352 704 588 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.71 init
2 root RT -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 migration/ 03
root 34 19 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0: 00.00 ksoftirqd/0
4 root RT -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 watchdog/0
5 root RT -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 migration/1
6 root 34 19 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0: 00.00 ksoftirqd/1
7 root RT -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 watchdog/1
8 root RT -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 migration/2

Answer the question

In order to leave comments, you need to log in

5 answer(s)
Y
yadaya, 2011-04-08
@yadaya

well, 1 Gbit max 100 MB per second + costs, 300 meters per second on such equipment will not be.

L
livinger, 2011-04-08
@liveder

when aggregating two ports, you can achieve speeds in the region of 120mb / s (from memory)
when using iscsi, it achieved around 250mb / s.
used freebsd.

J
justabaka, 2011-04-08
@justabaka

You should test, say, FTP, or even run some kind of network benchmark - if the speed remains the same, you will need to look for a network problem.
If the speed increases more or less significantly, the problem may lie in the Windows machine. Then you have to look for answers to the questions:
* Does it support SMB 2.0?
* If not, is SMB over TCP used directly, or is there an archaic "SMB over NetBIOS over TCP/IP" pattern?

D
DAzgluk, 2011-04-08
@DAzgluk

Achieved a speed of 105 MB / s for reading from a software RAID0 on 2x HDD and 80 MB for writing.
I can say that I rummaged through a bunch of material, and tried to play with buffers. This speed was achieved under FreeBSD, samba 3.0 from ports, with the Async write option (or something like that). In Linux, samba was limited to 60MB / s, while FTP did 110+ here and there.
Windows 7 client (wrote to 3 gigabyte RAMdisk)
Used stupid gigabit switch acorp, Jumbo Frames does not support.
"Server" is a sempron 2.4 with a gig of memory)) Nforce built-in network card

F
FeNUMe, 2011-04-08
@FeNUMe

The problem is most likely in your network hardware. or setevukha, or a switch do not issue an honest gigabit. I have a cheap Noname switch at home - I couldn’t squeeze more than 50 MB / sec from it.

Didn't find what you were looking for?

Ask your question

Ask a Question

731 491 924 answers to any question