C
C
cpu78a2017-05-10 14:31:04
Programming
cpu78a, 2017-05-10 14:31:04

Which processor is better i7 6700 vs 6700k ... Ryzen?

I collect for graphics (3d rendering, graphics adobe ps / al / af + autocat)
If not for Ryzen, then the choice would be between 6700 and 6700k.
As I understand it, 6700 can be overclocked in the same way as 6700 and there is not much difference. The main thing is that the motherboard would be good in any case and memory. Or 6700k runs even better than 6700... if so, by how much. Just everything that I found, the result is one 4.7 GHz. Only the 6700 eats less, but the voltage needs to be increased, but what about the increase with the 6700k ... xs, the consumption is definitely higher.
I also looked at Ryzen 7, it seems to be gaining more in some tests, but in general it is on par or even loses to i7 6700 4.7. Is it even worth looking at? In theory, it renders faster due to its 8 cores and 16 threads, at a stable 3.1 GHz.
According to the rest of the tests, apparently due to optimization, there are no differences ... or it does not have the necessary instructions.
There are suggestions that the new i7 will be released already with 6 cores at least .. is it worth waiting for?
Yes, there is another 6800, but its motherboard costs 17-40k ... as a result, it is 12k more expensive, and the result is almost the same as with i7 4GHz, not to mention overclocking.
ps you shouldn't write about the new 7700 and 7700k, they are even worse than 67**

Answer the question

In order to leave comments, you need to log in

4 answer(s)
C
cpu78a, 2017-05-10
@cpu78a

You can look here
Draw your own conclusions

M
Maxim Timofeev, 2017-05-10
@webinar

"k" means - supporting overclocking; multiplier unlocked
That's the whole difference, they are the same processors
what for? What would die faster and get warmer? Once in the 90s, this gave a tangible increase and a reason to brag to the boys. Today, you will hardly notice the increase.
I can even promise, and then 1 more and 1 more, and at the start of sales it will cost more than it should. So if you want more expensive, you should wait, and then wait again, etc.
PS. You're trying to win performance pennies that you can't feel.

T
theurs, 2017-05-10
@theurs

Why wait for 6 cores if there are already 10?

P
Paul Nice, 2017-05-11
@Paul_Nice

And what is the budget? So you can wait
for 16 cores at a price of up to $ 1k . The workstation segment will be delighted. The Ryzen 7 1700 comes with a boxed cooler, which is quite enough, despite the fact that in multithreading it definitely wins at a good price, in general, the best you can find. Between 6700 and 6700k, the choice in favor of the former is more obvious if the budget is an issue.

Didn't find what you were looking for?

Ask your question

Ask a Question

731 491 924 answers to any question