Which Linux distribution to choose for working from flash drives via RDP?

Question

linux

The question is simple, but in the abundance of options I got confused.
We are transferring the enterprise to a client-server model, one might say. That is, 1 WinServer and 10-15 diskless clients with Linux on flash drives connect via RDP and work. Roughly speaking, you need a sort of stand-alone-rdp-client.
I saw Puppy Linux, it doesn't fit.
I've tried SlaxLinux, but sorry, Slackware is in a museum.
Options with downloading over the network are also not suitable, because. users work from different offices.
Are there simple free ready-made solutions on Linux or do you need to build your bike again?
The tasks of a linux live usb distra are to load everything in RAM, quietly fit on an 8 GB flash drive, so as not to write gigabytes of logs and other service information to the media, tk. A USB flash drive every 2-3 months is also an unnecessary expense.

Answer 1

I'm thinking about this one: habrahabr.ru/post/144822
Build on the OpenSuse constructor.
As an extreme option, finish Ubuntu according to the article: help.ubuntu.ru/wiki/ubuntu_%D0%BD%D0%B0_usb
Simple, ready-made and working solutions, as I see it, do not exist as such. Everyone in what much collects his bike.
By the way, as a temporary solution, I found an assembly on WinPE :) I even think of abandoning the solution on Linux and building my own assembly a little later. Natively.
UPD: Xubuntu was eventually chosen as a temporary solution. In principle, the simplest option, performance even via USB 2.0 is sufficient, in general, to connect via Remmina to Windows servers and download files to the server from flash drives, as well as fairly trouble-free work with printers and Windows balls.

Answer 2

It's funny. A person can make an assessment about Slackware being sent to a museum... and can't choose a distribution. inconsistency

Answer 3

thinstation.

Answer 4

Maybe these will fit, but I have not worked with them. I have heard about them and advise only by hearsay, not from my own experience, so be skeptical, but still, here they are (copying the information):
Tails is a live Linux distribution based on Debian and created for confidential and anonymous use networks (encryption, anonymization and security of interception / wiretapping of traffic). Contains a set of programs and utilities that allow you to completely anonymously access the Internet and use other services and services (mail, im-messages, etc.). To achieve privacy, the distribution uses the Tor network.
SliTaz is a very small Linux distribution for computers with low memory (RAM) and older computers. The distribution image takes only 35 megabytes and is fully loaded into RAM, providing high speed. SliTaz can be installed on a hard drive or run in LiveCD mode.
But they write logs or not, where - I can not say.

Answer 5

Linux, a priori, is not selected based on some client there. The client is separate, the operating system is separate, including the question of where to store files / data, and so on.
Choose the distribution that you like the most, where you think it is more clear to you, and then customize it for yourself.

Answer 6

When you try to set up RDP in the same Ubuntu or Mint, so that there is a universal flash drive on several computers and everything works in remina, including video and sound, you will already regret that you didn’t start using a miniature distribution and stuffed only the necessary video drivers there (