E
E
Elnur Mamedov2019-01-09 11:03:39
Database
Elnur Mamedov, 2019-01-09 11:03:39

Which In-Memory DG/DB to choose?

Hello fellow toasters. I need your help again :) I need a low latency database that can work with a relatively small amount of data of 100-300k rows, but most importantly, that can filter these rows by 12-15 parameters and give the result in less than 5ms. After many hours of googling, I came across such a thing as In-Memory Database and In-Memory Data Grid. I found more than a dozen options, but I just can’t find the right one for me.
Key requirements:
- Low query latency
- Data persistence (something like Write Ahead Log)
- Presence of a more or less convenient client for .net core
I tried Redis and Tarantool, but they didn't work for me. Radish is more suitable for cache. I liked the Tarantula more, the delay is excellent, often less than 1 ms, but I've been tinkering with it for the third day already, and several points stop, namely, the absence of some data types, a low-level client for .net core and not the most detailed documentation.
Such are the things. Ideally, I hope to hear from you the names of cool and convenient IMDB and IMDG :)
Many thanks in advance to everyone!

Answer the question

In order to leave comments, you need to log in

1 answer(s)
L
Leonid, 2019-05-15
@caballero

if we are talking about .net, then the dataset with tables lives quite well in memory, and selections can be made through LINQ

Didn't find what you were looking for?

Ask your question

Ask a Question

731 491 924 answers to any question