Answer the question
In order to leave comments, you need to log in
Which command processor (shell) is the most advanced and convenient in Linux?
Here I asked which terminal is the most advanced and convenient in Linux, but there I was corrected that I meant a shell and asked to ask a new question.
I used fish for a while - I liked the auto-completion in it, but I had to constantly dance with a tambourine after installing new programs.
Is it possible to upgrade bash/zsh to a fish-like state? Perhaps there are projects that make the native shell more powerful and intelligent, like fish, but without unnecessary gestures. So that everything is highlighted in different ways, auto-completed like in the IDE (ideally, so that icons for different types of files are shown before the name) and, as they say, so that everything magically "whistles and farts". Or is the only normal option is to play with fish?
Answer the question
In order to leave comments, you need to log in
Or is the only normal option is to play with fish?
If you need to tweak bash , check out Oh My Bash! . I myself prefer bash as it is or sh .
sh - because this is the most inconvenient but the most standard, and if you work on different servers, then not everywhere there is something different from sh and even bash, and most importantly, you can’t always set the usual one for you. Therefore, it is better to learn to use what is everywhere. Otherwise, it may turn out that you are working on a fallen production server, and instead of working, you have to retrain to the default one.
bash or zsh
And you don't need to look for anything else, especially fake whistles.
(Ideally, so that icons for different types of files are shown before the name) and, as they say, so that everything magically "whistles and farts".
Didn't find what you were looking for?
Ask your questionAsk a Question
731 491 924 answers to any question