Answer the question
In order to leave comments, you need to log in
Answer the question
In order to leave comments, you need to log in
cloud.feedly.com (has an API that many third party clients use, e.g. Press, Reader+, gReader)
tt-rss on home server. Pros - easy to install and configure, easy to import subscriptions. Open source, own server => there is control over the situation. Even if the developer refuses to implement the functionality you need, you can always fork and implement it yourself. In addition, there is a developed system of plugins, which makes it easy to create new / change existing functionality.
Went to several places at once to try:
theoldreader.com - everything seems fine, but a bit slow
reader.digg.com - very fast, but not yet: number of unread, arrows in the UI to move between records, and mark as unread buttons
reader.aol.com - very cool.
The biggest hope for a dig reader - I'll see how it develops, they promise frequent and positive updates.
Feedly.
WP8 has an excellent Nextgen Reader that syncs subscriptions and reads with great speed. Works faster than with Google Reader.
Let's see how long
feedly.com and look towards feedbin.me
For me, in general, the main thing is what service Reeder , which is extremely convenient for me, will work with .
I probably tried everything that is described here, all the dull shit, I'm sitting on the same dull old reader shit, along the way I'll have to switch to tinytiny rss in order to have timely updated feeds.
well, or dig will normally add his reader.
InoReader
pros:
- interface and features are very similar to GR, which is very convenient
- easy import of subscriptions from GR
- many settings
Cons
- when scrolling with hot keys, it sometimes bugs and jumps over 2 news (this is the main disadvantage, it infuriates wildly)
- sometimes the bot lies, which parses subscriptions
- the bot indexes subscriptions less often than the GR bot
- sometimes a glitch pops up and in one subscription I have news 3 months ago
newsify.co/ - easy to read on your phone. I don't have time to read this from my computer :)
reader.aol.com is a nice interface, it works fast, in general, I like everything.
Rssowl for desktop.
Pros:
- Finds the RSS feed by itself when specifying the domain.
- Works fast.
- Shows notifications of new news.
Cons:
— The design is a bit old.
I temporarily sit on feedbin.me and finish NewsBlur to fit my needs , even the client sources are posted in it
It is necessary to arrange a poll with a vote, so it will be better. In essence, I can say that I switched to InoReadear, in my opinion there is nothing superfluous, only what is needed. Adapted in a few minutes.
On the desktop, I generally transfer everything to Opera Mail, on mobile readers from Opera Mini. On the web, for a while, I transferred several key feeds to Yandex.Subscriptions, maybe I’ll refuse the web reader altogether (I also have an issue with Opera Mini, because the reader depends on Opera Software servers), because. there is no trust in the reliability of commercial services (Google at least allowed to pull out the data and gave it 4 months, and most of the other services, I’m sure, will shut down completely silently and won’t bother with saving and exporting user data).
In general, it would be great if Internet Archive or the Wikimedia Foundation launched their own reader with search, full archiving of feeds and an API for mobile clients, especially since this corresponds to their desire to save information on the Web.
feedly.com, but as soon as the digg reader is completed, I will switch to it, I really liked it
Didn't find what you were looking for?
Ask your questionAsk a Question
731 491 924 answers to any question