N
N
n3r4r12015-01-11 16:21:41
Programming
n3r4r1, 2015-01-11 16:21:41

Where are the 128-bit processors?

Why are 128-bit processors not used?

Answer the question

In order to leave comments, you need to log in

2 answer(s)
I
Igor Ermolaev, 2015-02-05
@ErmIg

It is important here what do you mean by 128-bit processors?
1) If the ability to work with 128-bit pointers, then probably this will not be required in the foreseeable future, since 64-bit pointers are enough for now, which can address about 10 ^ 19 bytes.
2) If the ability to work with real numbers with a bit depth of 128-bit, then such a processor was in the 70s IBM_System / 370 , but then the hardware support for such numbers was abandoned as unnecessary.
3) If the ability to work with 128-bit integers, then such a processor was also in the 80s VAX (although 4 32-bit registers were used there to work with 128-bit numbers), but then they also refused hardware support for such numbers .
4) If it’s just the presence of 128-bit registers, then there are such processors for a long time (there are already 256-bit, and 512-bit is expected in the near future), though they store not single numbers, but vectors of real or integer numbers of lesser capacity .

S
Sergey Lerg, 2015-01-11
@Lerg

In video cards they cost even more, where it makes sense. In general purpose processors, this is not necessary, at least not yet. Too much complexity of the architecture for a dubious gain.

Didn't find what you were looking for?

Ask your question

Ask a Question

731 491 924 answers to any question