Answer the question
In order to leave comments, you need to log in
When to use thin clients and when to use zero?
Good afternoon, please tell me when to use a thin client, and when to use a zero one?
We have an entire enterprise, they want to transfer to thin and zero clients. Approximately 200c+ jobs.
Everything on blade servers, as I understand it, they want to do.
- Most employees use office programs (Word, Ex, etc.), + 1s. + small office software
- And a number of employees work in Corel / Photoshop / AutoCAD / Revit.
I am very far from this. But the system administrator suggests doing part of it on thin clients, part on zero clients, and everything on blade servers. All dell solutions. I need an understanding that he is not fooling me. Since if anything, I will have to answer for all the jambs.
Answer the question
In order to leave comments, you need to log in
I will write theses in defense of thin clients:
1. This is a great option for mass, simple jobs of the same type.
2. Maintaining a bunch of blade servers and backing them up is much nicer than 200+ heterogeneous desktops.
3. You can greatly reduce the number of ordinary enikeis who maintained these 200+ machines in working order. In thin clients, there is nothing special to break, requests should become much less.
4. Employees can be transferred to remote work with near-zero time.
5. If a thin client breaks down, the employee simply changes to another free client and continues to work with his environment and all his files.
6. In 1C, you can get a very good performance boost if both the databases and clients are located on the same server or in a cluster.
7. If you say that old computers are already very noisy and almost all of them have been written off, then you really need to update a large fleet of equipment and buying thin clients will be more cost-effective than buying new desktops.
Now about the oddities of your particular decision:
In my opinion, the transition to thin clients should be cost-effective. However, you point out that 90 thousand rubles have been allocated for equipment for 1 workplace, which, in my opinion, is too much.
Plus, this binding is to one vendor (in your case, to dell).
This is very much like cutting budgets and kickbacks.
Ask for a test drive. I have a Dell thin client on the farm, I accidentally strayed. Lying around in the pantry, I have not found application in the home infrastructure.
Most employees use office programs (Word, Ex, etc.), + 1s. + small office softwarefor them, you can switch to cloud solutions, everything except 1C is generally in the browser, but 1C is from the server.
And a number of employees work in Corel / Photoshop / AutoCAD / Revit.and here problems can arise with any remote solutions, you need to understand more specifically, test whether everything will work no worse than locally.
Didn't find what you were looking for?
Ask your questionAsk a Question
731 491 924 answers to any question