What's wrong with ArangoDB?

Question

Database

At first glance it seems like a worthy solution. But neither here nor on Habré there is almost nothing about it, except for mentions in the list of graph databases. What's wrong with her?

Answer 1

Everything is fine with her . It develops, has its own community and a small ecosystem. Demanded by employers (foreign) 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 .

But neither here nor on Habré there is almost nothing about it, except for mentions in the list of graph databases. What's wrong with her?

Everything is so with her, with habr it’s not quite so: there are authors who are carried on their hands, despite the fact that they usually write articles not on advanced technologies and new knowledge;
there are well-established trends for which they will tear their throats (the same SQL);
the majority of readers and writers are our compatriots. You yourself know that our country, in spite of all the TV exhortations, is backward in technical, technological and not only plans;
the imposition of all sorts of patriotic views (everything that comes to us from the West is the essence of the evil one), also gives its sediment. Therefore, many without looking adore what is broken with us or with the participation of our programmers (zabbix, nginx, postgresql, sphinx, ...).

Answer 2

everything is so
one of two or three (also orient and Neo4j) graph ones, the language is better than Neo4j, the amount of data occupied is less than two times (2017, since then neo has taken some steps, maybe not so)
but not enough - because that few people even know about graphs at all (they “remember” on this issue at graphql social security services), and the very concept of data junctions in the era of microservices is also not so widespread
in purely Nocl and SKL Arango loses to the classics