Answer the question
In order to leave comments, you need to log in
What NDA terms are adequate?
Roughly speaking, NDA is:
1. An agreement on what is confidential information and should not be disclosed.
2. Conditions: term and size/format of sanctions for violation of this agreement.
The question is about a contract between an organization and an individual (freelancer, subcontractor, etc.). Russia.
What do you think, what parameters of the contract ( duration and amount of sanctions ) are adequate for you (as a performer, as an organization) and why?
What conditions did you personally encounter? What would scare you as a performer?
As a performer, I have seen the wording "within 3 years, 10,000 rubles for each fact of disclosure", and "99 years and 1,000,000 rubles in case of disclosure." Moreover, the severity of the conditions did not at all correspond to the scope of the project and the potential risks from disclosure for companies.
Answer the question
In order to leave comments, you need to log in
what other "99 years and 1,000,000 rubles in case of disclosure"? What country do you live in?
I did these NDAs, redid them, and nowhere, even in the coolest offices with projects worth millions more than "5 years from the date of expiration ..." was not.
Liability is within the limits of direct proven damage.
It is better to take care of understanding what CI is and how it is transmitted and received.
In your opinion, what parameters of the contract (duration and size of sanctions) are adequate for you (as a performer, as an organization) and why?
yes, it doesn’t matter, almost all Russian nda violate the labor code of the Russian Federation and are a frightening piece of paper on which
Didn't find what you were looking for?
Ask your questionAsk a Question
731 491 924 answers to any question