What implementations of the RTMFP protocol exist in nature?

Question

Video broadcast

Actually overtook the issue of organizing volumetric video streaming.
Load tests have shown that using rtmfp can significantly save server bandwidth.
So far, I have found:
- cumulus
- go-rtmfp
- rtmfp.py from rtmplite
Actually, they do not fully support the capabilities of the protocol, and in general are not suitable for solving the tasks set, since they were developed from the same reverses, before the publication of drafts and the RFC. Began to disassemble the documentation of the protocol - rather sensible piece.
Perhaps there is something else?

Answer 1

Adobe Flash Media Server

Answer 2

By the way, Wowza, one of the leaders among analogues, is in no hurry to introduce RTMFP support . Red5 also seems to be working on it, but the result is not visible. Erlyvideo, similarly .
Also, judging by forums.adobe.com/thread/636094 and forums.adobe.com/message/2809280 , the implementation of this protocol is not very beneficial, since RTMFP does not bypass NAT.
Also, given the prevalence of flash on mobile devices, the focus on HTML5 and developments related to WebRTC, it is unlikely that anyone will do this much.

Answer 3

1. Mona Server
Former Cumulus.
2. Web Call Server 4
Supports RTMFP streams and conversion to RTSP, Websocket,
WebRTC you can organize the exchange of video streams between:
IE - IE
IE - Chrome / Firefox
IE - VLC / RTSP player
IE - iOS Safari
Here IE works with Flash Player and the server via the RTMFP protocol.
NAT is not terrible if there is a server that can proxy streams.
Many legacy systems continue to run flash-based Adobe FMS and Wowza. It is often very expensive for them to switch to WebRTC and other technologies. So, at least on the desktop, Flash still feels good.