D
D
Danil Day2016-03-29 12:07:00
Freelance
Danil Day, 2016-03-29 12:07:00

What freelancing is easier to get to the top?

Fl.ru or Freelance? Naturally, everywhere you need to sweat hard and spend some money. Where can you do it faster? Are there any features, differences between freelance sites?
P\s: "Go to the top" is conditional. It means to raise the acc to a solid level in order to receive many orders. Thank you!

Answer the question

In order to leave comments, you need to log in

6 answer(s)
P
Puma Thailand, 2016-03-29
@danidey

Upwork seems to be the simplest now, a good employee reaches the top in about 1-3 months.
There is practically no competition in the top and everyone knows each other.

V
vaux, 2016-03-29
@vaux

If you are not a top specialist, then nowhere.

S
Sergey, 2016-03-29
@gangstarcj

To receive many orders, you need to work hard and work very well, the timing, quality, communication with the client must be at a high level.
So on any normal freelance exchange

W
Web Developer Blog, 2016-03-29
@Alexey_Suprun

Learn, gain experience, everything is possible on any exchange

M
Mikhail Vasiltsev, 2016-04-06
@mihail430899

See here for a list of all the major freelance exchanges. On Fl.ru, only a real professional will be able to get to the top, this is my opinion. The younger the freelance exchange, the easier it is, but the less sense from a good account.

C
cijiw, 2016-06-11
@cijiw

Qualification, if any, is easy .
I would choose UpWork
Why do you, after hearing about fabulous earnings from qualified specialists, think that it's all about getting somewhere in the right place ?
Only your qualification decides.
There is a shortage of qualified specialists, they are hunted.

https://habrahabr.ru/post/270267/

In the midst of an extremely depressed job market, the sheer desperation seen in the wars for software talent is incredible. Almost every day I see big companies, small companies, sophisticated entrepreneurs, start-up entrepreneurs, and even venture capitalists out on the hunt for smart heads. Talent hunters flood LinkedIn, set snares on Quora, and cast nets on Facebook and Google+. Cartoons of a bum-faced CEO holding a placard looking for a tech-savvy co-founder are circulating around. Hell, I myself am one of those hunters (by the way, is there a cool iOS developer among you who is willing to cooperate with me?).
Zealous newfound angel investors are ready to throw money into any project in which one or another strong developer participates, counting on the fact that even if this project fails, the opportunity to be in the forefront of investors in the next project of the same developer is worth it.
Entire startups were created solely to keep good development teams together.
Gold cages with jobs that come with gourmet buffets, high-tech sleeping quarters and day care centers are just the tip of the iceberg.
Basically, these are the mechanisms available to big - "too big to fail" - software companies like Google, Facebook and Microsoft. In a game where these major league players set the bar for monetary (and not only quality of life) rewards for work, and start-up startups take advantage of the fact that they provide a real opportunity to hit a truly big jackpot, no other type of business has any the slightest chance in the competition for big talent, no matter how much cash or stock he dumps on the negotiating table.
If you don’t care who you work for, specialization is not important, then you can easily have a bunch of work too.
But only for food.

Didn't find what you were looking for?

Ask your question

Ask a Question

731 491 924 answers to any question