Video tutorials are long and a lot of water. Is it worth spending time on them?

Question

IT education

What are the pros and cons?
I started studying layout, but looked at the total length of the files - 240 hours!

Answer 1

No, it's not worth it.
You will stupidly listen to how the burry, lowing Vasyan retells some learnjavascript, skipping half of the topics that he himself does not understand.
And such videos - 90%.

Answer 2

Video lessons are good only for those who sell them or make money on it in another way.
Reading is more efficient and better for memory.
After I read php for beginners by McGart, and then PHP 7 by D. Koterov, I realized how much time I wasted on strange video lessons.
And of course the forums.

Answer 3

Find the ones without water. Video lessons are like a lecture at an institute.

Answer 4

The system of curbing thought is already in operation, in the so-called system of visual education , which has to turn the goyim into unthinking, obedient animals, waiting for visualization in order to figure it out ...

Protocol of the Elders of Zion, item 16

Answer 5

Video lessons combine the worst features of a book and a lecture.
As in the book - the material is rigidly set and is fed linearly. Moreover, unlike a book, it is more difficult to flip through it. It is impossible, as in a lecture, to interrupt the flow of speech and ask the lecturer.
As in a lecture - the speed of the material is set from the outside. It is impossible, as in a book, to change the speed of reading.
However, video tutorials are indispensable if you need to show something that is done by hand. Much can be depicted in pictures - but not everything.
And finally, making a bad video tutorial is much easier than writing a bad book.

Answer 6

I watch these tutorials at 1.5x speed. Basically, having reached a specific task on the course, I solve it with the knowledge that I received at such a speed of browsing and Google.
There is a definite meaning, but there is no need to watch the full course of 240 hours.

Answer 7

I learned from video tutorials. I came across a good course on WordPress and immediately began to rivet sites. The advantage of video tutorials is that you immediately see the result - how it works, unlike a book. But with the help of a book, you can thoroughly study the material. Both of these can be combined. At first, you can watch video tutorials for a superficial acquaintance (if not enough), and then take the literature.

Answer 8

In my experience, video lessons are only suitable at the beginning of the path of learning something new, when a person speaks in the brain, infa is fixed as more significant, but it’s useless to watch just like that, you need to do 1 in 1 the same as people on the video, create files, run them and anything like that is exactly the same and put pauses if you do not have time.

Answer 9

IMHO video lessons should be considered only within the framework of the training program, as "lecture material".
The curriculum includes lectures, but "feedback" plays an important role.
Those. tasks, exercises, laboratory work.
Without them, the material is not assimilated from the word at all.
If you don't know how to teach yourself. Those. create a training program and follow it.
That video tutorials will not give you anything, just like reading.
So practice, practice and more practice.
Come up with a problem and solve it.
Be sure to use sample applications from github (if you are learning a library or framework).

Answer 10

As a first step, it's definitely worth it. Especially if you are one of those who perceive well only when they show you how to do it.
For this, about 20 lessons are enough. And then tinkering with your own ideas.
Invented / saw somewhere that you liked and do it. Questions come up along the way and you solve them.
What scares away video tutorials on YouTube - there you almost always ask a question to the side, and the author either ignores or answers some kind of game, well, what can this teach? Only the basics. Just to make sure it's not scary.

Answer 11

Recently, I am inclined to the conclusion that if the author managed to fit his course into a 6-8 hour interval, then this is a good course. I don’t need all the details at this stage, the essence is important to me, and if the author cannot briefly explain the topic that he himself has chosen, then this is an inflated course.
The rest of the little things can be googled. Also view reviews and ratings for the course. And yes, you need to add at least 20% of them to 240h.

Answer 12

It is worth watching and reading everything that arouses interest.
240 hours is just the beginning. You will spend your whole life watching videos and reading books. There will be millions of hours. 240 is only the first step :).

Answer 13

It's all about the course.
If the author presents the material in an accessible language, clearly, and does not pour "water", then the video is definitely preferable to books.
The main thing is to find such a video course.