Test?

Question

Java

There remains a completed test task for the position of Java Developer in a fairly large company.
The question is, how ethical would it be to publish my decision? The task is already about half a year old (I'm talking about the statute of limitations). Or is it better to try to break it down into topics and write related articles/guides?

Answer 1

You spent your time on this task and did not sign any NDA (I believe) - then it is your right to do whatever you want with your code.

Answer 2

If this is a typical task, from a textbook, then there is nothing wrong with posting an answer.
If this task was developed specifically, taking into account the specifics of the organization's work, then it is not ethical.
In any case, it seems to me that it is better to publish an article on the topic that was in the assignment.

Answer 3

Ask management? Maybe in a few months the task will change (if this has not already happened) and publish on health)

Answer 4

The decisive factor in this matter should probably be the expediency of this decision. If you think that the material is interesting and not typical, then I think it’s worth publishing (without highlighting any specific data about the studio where the testing took place and maybe even without its name).
The main thing is that it would not be already “chewed” typical example of work.

Answer 5

I think that it is quite possible to simply even talk about passing the selection to the company, and just mention the condition of the test task without a solution. (although it’s also worth consulting with those who selected you, maybe the task is really unique and after such a publication, everyone who makes a request to Google “tasks at an interview in% company name%”) will start solving it.