K
K
Kulver_stukas2018-01-12 13:34:04
Smart House
Kulver_stukas, 2018-01-12 13:34:04

Smart home and IoT - how much is this topic really interesting now in Russia?

Not as a niche toy for the super-rich like Hi-End Audio, and not as entertainment for geeks like 3D printers. To what extent is this a potentially massive topic for the average Russian (living with his wife and 1 child in a 2-room apartment in a panel house)?

Answer the question

In order to leave comments, you need to log in

6 answer(s)
S
sim3x, 2018-01-12
@sim3x

Read about the costs of this level of people and do something else

P
pavelkunyavskiy, 2018-01-12
@pavelkunyavskiy

Now the topic is a smart grow box for growing hemp.

F
Fat Lorrie, 2018-01-12
@Free_ze

To make it interesting is a matter of marketing. The very topic of a smart home is really intriguing, this can be seen from the number of arduino / raspberry people on YouTube who are trying to make something themselves.
But the market for ready-made devices is practically empty - most companies release their own, completely closed infrastructure. And when you are forced to buy products of one brand, and even with a huge overpayment, which is not reflected in the quality of the device itself, then this is sad.
Yes, and most often these are controlled devices and automation, and not a smart home at all.
It turns out that really something suitable is done by special firms - to order and at a high price. Or people make their own, if skills allow.

V
Vitaliy Orlov, 2018-01-12
@orlov0562

For an ordinary family living in a socket, a smart home is an absolutely useless thing. Nightlights with a light sensor, if needed, are bought at the nearest market, for $1. Gas leak detector = $10. All other problems, such as turning off the light, turning on the TV, are solved by switches and a remote control.
Of course, to play - yes, it's cool. But, in reality, in an apartment with 2-3 rooms, all this will not be in demand by 99% of the population.

K
kn0ckn0ck, 2018-01-12
@kn0ckn0ck

I don't agree about the geeks at all. Read reviews like this . It describes what needs to be done to implement a minimal scenario with a light and a motion sensor in the kitchen.
After that, return to the idea of ​​geeks: what kind of technology should be in order to use it and not be a geek? Turnkey solutions are not just expensive, they are ready-made solutions. Try to repeat something similar and not become a geek at the same time.
So there are three options:
1. buy on a turnkey basis and enjoy comfort
2. assemble automation (not a smart home) of the simplest scenario from the "box" and calm down
3. become a geek, save money and enjoy comfort
Choose :)

V
Vladimir, 2018-01-16
@mf211

Most likely just an expensive toy or a complex of expensive toys with notifications on a mobile phone. (management from mobile devices as the main one I consider a dead end, a normal implementation should think for the end user)
The concept of a smart home is certainly good. But de facto there is only home automation. And most likely not completed to its logical end. Somewhere I read how the owner of a house with a "smart" house installed watched a video broadcast from a video surveillance camera via the Internet as his own house was burning down. I will not voice a hint of unprepared functionality.
But if there are circulation! cheap! solutions that will perform all the functions assigned to it, that is, there is a chance that it will take off. But again, this is a double-edged sword. iron is one thing that can already be found almost cheap. And setting up end sensors and actuators is another.

Didn't find what you were looking for?

Ask your question

Ask a Question

731 491 924 answers to any question