Recommend a version control system

Question

CVS

I want to start using the version control system for my projects. Although in general it suits the good old copying of the project directory to a new directory with a date in the name, but something tells me that using a version control system is more convenient. But I don't know what to choose! Online service or local repository. Which client (preferably cross-platform, just in case). I ask for advice!

Answer 1

Bitbucket - mercurial, git, maintains private repositories on a free plan .
GitHub - git, private repositories available on a paid plan . Strong social component. + Gist
What is better?

Answer 2

Git, it can be both local and remote, and all together and whatever, the decentralized keyword. For remote storage look BitBucket , they give any number of private repositories.

Answer 3

I think it's kind of cruel to tell someone who has never used version control systems to try git.
Mercurial is much easier to just get started with. On Habré there is an excellent list of articles from Spolsky about Mercurial habrahabr.ru/post/108443/

Answer 4

git or mercurial. svn is no longer up to date

Answer 5

If you plan to version under Windows, then definitely Mercurial.
He gets up without oddities, like min-gw and a pack of Linux utilities from Git. And at first, a visual GUI (TortoiseHg) will not hurt you. And with Mercurial, it is much more usable than its counterparts for Git (and I tried a lot and, apart from repeated disappointment, experienced nothing). And in general, it is much more human, not like Git.
The only negative: BitBucket is not as good as GitHub, but if you are not open source, then you are in the black.

Answer 6

git

Answer 7

Mercurial may be simpler, but Git will almost certainly come in handy in the future.