LiteSpeed ​​vs. Apache/nginx?

Question

Nginx

I choose a new place for the site, they offer to install a paid LiteSpeed ​​as an alternative to the free Apache / nginx.

Naturally, on the LiteSpeed ​​offsite they write that many times faster, safer and better. But is this really so?

Tell me, does it make sense?

Answer 1

Do you want to buy a product that no one has heard anything about, merging it with ops-source domestic developments, and then for a couple of years asking yourself the question “so why don’t I switch to a normal server? Oh yeah, I paid for this one? There is no way.

Answer 2

I would ditch apache altogether and install a regular nginx + fastcgi daemon for the language in which the dynamic content is. nginx is still a time-tested, very smart and functional solution, the only thing is that you need to be able to write configs for it.

Answer 3

By the way, if CentOS is installed on the server, then I recommend connecting these repositories: centos.alt.ru/?p=120 (see "Installing the repository")
then you need to do the following:
1. yum update
2. yum install mysql mysql-server php php-common php-cli php-mysql php-fpm php-gd php-suhosin php-mhash php-mbstring nginx (+ add required
packages
) )

Answer 4

If possible, it is better to use the nginx + php-fpm bundle. In 99% of cases, the transfer problem is solved by writing the correct config for nginx.
I just couldn’t put Python + Django under nginx, I had to put Apache with mod_python on the background (but I didn’t really delve into the nginx settings, there was no time).

Answer 5

Looked quickly. In general, in terms of functionality, this is the same nginx only with full support for .htaccess and some mod_*. In general, the price of the issue is important here, if it's inexpensive - it makes sense, if it's expensive - it's easier to rewrite the rules for nginx or just put nginx in front of apache.