Answer the question
In order to leave comments, you need to log in
Licensing MSSQL Server 2012
Welcome all.
I want to share information, if you don't already know.
Today I talked at a conference with a licensing employee from MS and he told me how the new MSSQL 2012 is licensed.
For me, it was a shock, because. now there will be no licenses for the processor (cpu), but licenses for the CORE (core). The price of a license for the core will be approximately - the cost of an MSSQL 2008 processor license divided by 4.
Why by 4? And hz, they probably think that there are no more 6 core processors.
There are also radical changes in MSSQL licensing, if you are interested, I can post a presentation as soon as it is given to me from the conference.
Colleagues, what do you think about it?
Answer the question
In order to leave comments, you need to log in
It's time to move on to Linux with the MS licensing policy.
This is not a holivar - I myself have spent more than 12 years on MS products and still have to work. But as a database, I'm already thinking about migrating to PostgreSql & MongoDB.
From the outside, this variation looks more logical, more flexible. But for those who have a processor with a number of cores > 4, they should be upset and vice versa ...
My opinion is that M$ wants to drive us into the clouds or into virtual machines.
Many Cloud providers set themselves a feature that the virtual machine saw cores, not processors. Today, for the sake of interest, I went to the machine of a friend who ordered a virtual server with 2 cores and what I saw there is 2 processors, even in the task manager.
Although this is a sad fact in my case - the rejection of processors, M$ left licensing by user.
got a presentation.
docs.google.com/open?id=14DmA9_p1SONYG852Fp8gQuVlutIGtDiFIQQaw7k7zbCPFyACf0SfZI98n3nT
Didn't find what you were looking for?
Ask your questionAsk a Question
731 491 924 answers to any question