Is there any positive experience of using a 10 gigabit local network to share a 1c file base for 3-5 users?

Question

1C

Does anyone have a positive experience of using a 10 gigabit local network to share a 1c file base for 3-5 users? Will it save you from brakes (base ~ 300 mb)?
I really do not want to fence the garden with a server, terminal connections (expensive, plus you need to keep track of all this economy). A 10 gigabit network seems to have fallen in price now.

Answer 1

Actually, the classic problem is kb.mista.ru/article.php?id=136 (yes, I know that the article at the link says about the 7th version). In fairness, it should be noted that people with "NAS on an alternative OS" (provided "out of the box") have exactly the same problems. Well, we must remember that for 1C 8.2, thin and thick clients under * nix do not work, which means that under the bases in the case of * nix, you will most likely have to allocate a separate computer.
The option with a 10Gb network, if it solves the problem, is only temporary, as well as the options with SSD and raids.

Answer 2

What version of 1C?
For file 1C, you can simply put an ssd on the host, without a raid and a regular gigabit, it should be enough for 3-5 users.
For independence, you can take such a box .

Answer 3

Hmm, but what, the gigabit does not pull?
We have a base of 10 gigs, and then, nrm pulled on gigabit in file mode, until the disk ran out.
In the near future we will connect the drive and see how it will be.
In fairness, now "Trade Management", edition 10.3 (10.3.18.3), it is optimized specifically for working on the network. Previous UT hung mercilessly.

Answer 4

It's not about network speed. Better improve the file system, raid array 10, ssd ...
By the way, I recently tested the database on one SSD and Raid 10. SSD won in speed one and a half times.

Answer 5

Set up monitoring of the processor, disk, network first.
The transition of the network to 10g should be done only after it becomes clear on the network load graphs that the network is the bottleneck.

Answer 6

No, the problem is not in the grid, but in Windows: when working on the network, the cache of the machine on which the base is not used. Possible solutions: put the database file on a NAS with an alternative OS, or use the latest 10 UT, where the cache of local machines seems to be used when working on the network.

Answer 7

Terminal kanesh is also a solution. But for me - a crutch. The terminal did not take root with us, all the time you feel like a guest.
And if you have money, just raise a 10-gigabit, it will come in handy, although it will not solve the problem.
Really at you by the local machine all nrm?

Answer 8

And, there is also a solution to install a server, but this is an expensive solution. A license for a server 1c is not so cheap, but for me it’s fucking expensive.

Answer 9

Instead of it is simpler to insert 3 usual gigabit cards and to each computer a link, and you are assured that rests against gigabit? That is, look at the monitoring and see that the network is right up against gigabit?
so the entire database of 300 megabytes per gigabit should be transferred in 3 seconds if the screws allow.

Answer 10

What OS are you using for the server?

Answer 11

In December 2013, 1C released a server for 5 users at a price that is much more affordable than a full-fledged server.