Is there any point in cheap vps hosting?

Question

Network administration

Hello. My virtual hosting on hostland is ending, and I decided to switch to another one (hostland did not suit me). I started looking for other shared hosting, and apart from bad reviews, I did not find anything else. I tested several virtual hostings and all did not suit me, except for timeweb and webhost1. The criterion was simple: pure yii2 is uploaded to the hosting and tested on pagespeed. Each hosting showed different values, and timeweb and webhost1 had the best scores: smartphone - 82, PC - 91. The rest of the hostings fell, as a rule, for cache and for compression. But alas, timeweb and webhost1 have bad reviews. Every third person writes that sites lie down very often.
Now I came across vps hosting from jino for 100 rubles a month. Rumor has it that if you move from shared hosting to vps, you can forget about the problems of inaccessibility of the site.
My goal is this: to host 6 html sites (landing pages), with phpmailer attached to them and 1 on dle or wordpress. The average attendance of all sites combined does not exceed 300 people per day. + tweak caching and compression for each site, which requires pagespeed.
I have never been familiar with vps, but I have already found several guides on setting up the server on the net, so it seems to me that I will not have any special problems with setting up (you will only need to compress and somehow connect the cache).
So, I would like to know if it makes sense for me in such a vps, or will I have more problems?
Will 500 MHz and 500 MB of RAM be enough for me?
Will I really have no problems accessing sites?

Answer 1

it makes sense if you know how to administer yourself and are ready to fix the vpsk at any time
you went on vacation for a month the site broke on the first day, well, it will lie for a month while you are on vacation

Answer 2

The processor on the shared will be better. On a dead VPS, it will take longer for you to generate a page, which will affect the response time.
This is in short.

Answer 3

The influence of shared hosting on this score is really high and if you want to have maximum performance, then ideally you need to buy vps at least. Ideally, take at least 1GB of RAM ( of course, you can do less, but in most cases the memory will go to swap, although it all depends on the settings, of course) For a couple of sites, of course, 500 MHz is enough, the availability of sites is another matter, here you need to look at the quality of the hoster and read reviews. And there is also such an indicator as the presence of an ip hoster in the ban lists, the fact is that cheap VPS hosting is often used by spammers. A spammer rents a VPS and sends out a ton of mail in a day, ip gets into spam lists and the spammer abandons this VPS or the hoster blocks it. But the problem is that no one pulled this ip out of the spam lists, which means that when buying a VPS from a cheap hoster or from a hoster that gives test periods, there is a high probability that you will end up in spam databases right from the purchase and then launder your reputation.
I recommend this hoster
ref link or just a link
Adequate support, lack of spammers, good pings and quality indicators of virtual machines.

Answer 4

It makes sense, but not in your case.

Answer 5

yes, you can order a VPS.
at least not to share resources with other hosting clients.
If there are not enough resources, the server can always be upgraded. Add RAM, cores....