Is the site layout correct for search engine algorithms?

Question

Search Engine Optimization

Colleagues! I want to consult, see if everything on the site is correct for search engine optimization - allfillers.ru/products/revofil-aquashine-br
H1, title, description - what recommendations can you give?

Answer 1

Shaman here and that https://allfillers.ru/robots.txt

Answer 2

Title must be 60-70 characters with spaces
Description - 150-170

Answer 3

1. Shorten Title (by characters and words)
2. Exclude domain name from title
3. Meta http-equiv="Content-Type" pragma deprecated
4. Add http-equiv="x-ua-compatible"
5. Add meta charset
6. Write meta property="og:site_name"
7. Add link rel="canonical" if the page may have parameters that generate a page duplicate
8. Work on link rel="dns-prefetch", rel="preconnect", rel ="preload"
9. Page content is too small
10. Use strong, em on the page
11. Weak internal linking, add more internal links
12. Add User Agreement
13.Add a Privacy Policy
14. Add outgoing links to social groups in Fb, Inst, Ok, Tw, Vk, YouTube channel (if available)
15. Close outgoing links rel="noopener noreferrer"
16. Add microdata in JSON-LD format
17. Switch server to HTTP/ 2
18. In the URL, instead of "-" use the underscore "_"
In general, so, on top. If the task is tied to a key phrase, then points 200-250 can be further improved.

Answer 4

I will share my opinion.
1) Remove errors in layout syntax https://validator.w3.org/
2) Add alt to the logo
3) I don't see the point of making the logo a separate section...
4) Why a separate section for section id="topcontacts" ? I would define the content that inside the current section would be defined in the footer group of the main body content section (through css I would display it at the top of the page)
5) section id="content" - I see no reason to create this section with the main content, since this content is already located in the main section of the page. I don't see any other content blocks on the page that would justify this decision.
6) The breadcrumb path must lead from the main page of the site, not from the "catalog" listing page. I doubt that they are well designed in terms of proper nesting and semantics for your topic, so it's better to move them to the header group of the main body section and as close as possible to the opening body tag
7) When laying out images, use srcset attributes
8) Following the above, the article section class="content-block product__show" should already be section
9) The design is also not clear, why duplicate product names on the pages in the form you have now? one in h1 and the second in class="product__name show-for-medium" just below the first.
10) If you don’t delve into it for a long time,
11) Reviews, here of course they surprised me) Why were they posted as images? I don’t see any point in this implementation .. I would render the reviews block as a separate section, inside which I displayed reviews with text + you need to place a functionality with which these reviews can be left ... now they do not bring any benefit to the visitor, since they do not confirmed by their reality. The text that in the images also does not carry that profit, as it were, brought through the usual spelling. In general, with reviews, definitely work out other implementation options.
12) The H3 heading would be more correct to place in the section article class="row small-up-2 medium-up-4 large-up-4"
13) These two sections are not needed as for me class="small-12 column", id="statcounters-left".
I don't want to go deeper
I am not an expert, but only expressed my recommendations at the request of the author.