Answer the question
In order to leave comments, you need to log in
Is it worth learning Coffeescript ahead of the release of Ecmascript 6?
Always used JS only for all sorts of "snowflakes" and similar small whistles for the page. With the release of the new ES6, I decided to take a deeper look into the js-zoo and ran into such a dilemma. Many people recommend paying attention to "syntactic sugar" and other Coffeescript delights, but at the same time, it seems like ES has absorbed all the coolest things from all these Coffee, Typescript, etc. Is it worth it to spray these branches from the "native" js?
Answer the question
In order to leave comments, you need to log in
you should at least have a good knowledge of javascript (ES6 falls under this case), and whether or not to learn coffee or typescript is up to you. As for me, there is not much sense in the coffeescript, the goodies that were not transferred to the es standard are very doubtful. Type script - all the same ES + type hinting + additional goodies.
Conclusion - learn ES6 first and then do whatever you want.
Coffeescript is a matter of taste and not everyone likes it. If you personally like it, I see no reason not to teach.
There is an excellent holivar article on the topic of coffee on Habré: habrahabr.ru/post/195944
If you like this: "],[],[{},{},{}];};});]}});});})}}});}}]", then learning coffee is not costs.
It makes sense to familiarize yourself - so as not to get stuck when you come across a legacy written on this miracle.
Didn't find what you were looking for?
Ask your questionAsk a Question
731 491 924 answers to any question