Is it worth it to work under bosses who consider themselves smarter than others?

Question

Work organization

How to deal with bosses who work on the principle "I'm the boss, you're a fool"? Is it worth it to endure and work under the guidance of such people. Is it worth it to try to argue with such bosses, if you are sure that you are right on issues in which disagreements arise, or to score and do as they say? But then I'm afraid that I will lose the desire to think and develop, since everything is decided by the authorities.

Answer 1

I am the boss, you are the fool

Too general statement of the problem. The solution depends on how exactly this principle works. Besides, it doesn't even sound. It would be more logical "I am smart, you are a fool" or "I am the boss, and you are a subordinate, and must follow orders."
I suspect your problem boils down to "I'm right and you're wrong, but I'm the boss, so I have the final say anyway." Sounds more than logical. If you also add "I'm paying you a lot of money", then in general everything converges. The icing on the cake can be "I became the boss, but you are not." Then the problem comes down to antipathy. And the decision suggests itself - to become the boss yourself, to have the necessary hard and soft skills for this, to persuade the investor to invest in your project - and now, you are already cooler than anyone,
But think well what is the reason for such behavior of the boss. The fact is that there is a popular cognitive distortion , which explains success cases by personal qualities, and failure cases by circumstances. Moreover, in case of failure of the boss, it is you who will be these circumstances. This is a completely healthy cognitive bias that we have evolved to maintain self-esteem. Of course, it is not very honest to assert oneself at the expense of others, but the trick is that a person believes that he is right, i.e. Basically, he thinks he's being honest. The problem is exacerbated by the fact that the emotional intensity works as a factor that increases the distortion. It's funny that subordinates with unstable self-esteem have exactly the same distortion, making them think that they are right, and the boss -goat . Therefore, here you need to look at it in a complex way: namely, is it possible to reach out to the boss by giving his arguments in his favor and listening to his arguments. The recipe here is difficult to give, because many factors influence the decision. For example, the boss, or rather the business as a whole, may simply not have time for disputes, so a quick and not the most effective decision is made.
This distortion is broken in depressed people, so they tend to blame themselves a lot, which they suffer from. If you are such a person, then your opinion can be considered a little more objective, but you will have to keep it to yourself with such a boss. After all, now you know that such a flaw in other people in the form of distortion is normal, so you just have to reckon with it.
However, situations are different. If you are literally humiliated or you feel some kind of threat, then it’s really better not to deal with such a boss and leave such a job for another, more comfortable and happy one.

Answer 2

Lol, if you are so smart, then why not be in their place?
Maybe the situation is just the opposite?
You have no idea about management, how can you evaluate the correctness of the work of the authorities?

Answer 3

There are 2 options here.
1. They are not really stupid. Or so - they are not actually fools.
No offense, but in this case, "fool" = not right, you can be.
It’s just that we are so arranged that we don’t notice behind ourselves - who will doubt their own rightness.
2. They are actually "fools". In quotation marks because they can also have a boss and your boss thinks that he is wrong, but he is forced to pass his opinions to his subordinates and he won’t tell you directly about it, because. subordination.
Arguing is definitely not.
At best, he will politely listen and say - "do as I said."
The main thing is to have proof (letter, order) that you are doing exactly what the boss said. So that in which case he would not change his shoes later - "
As for whether to work under the guidance of such people - there are many aspects, for example, a psycho. comfort, recently settled down and in order not to look like a flyer, mat.
The desire to think - so think in parallel "on the table" "to yourself."
"Everything is decided by the authorities" - this is 99.9999%. This is the norm.

Answer 4

Hello, life is a choice, everyone chooses what to do, asking a similar question, you shift the responsibility for your life to others, you want to decide for you whether you should work for such a boss or not. I believe your boss is not just a boss, but a person who knows how to take responsibility for himself, otherwise he would not have held his position.
If you see that the boss thinks that he is smarter than you, then the opposite can be said, you think that you are smarter than the authorities, here you need to listen to both sides of you and your boss.

Answer 5

If they pay a million, then you can work.

Answer 6

Well, if you're so damn smart, then show that you're the best at what you do, and not at talking.
You can come up with a cunning plan and sit him down :) You're smart.
Think of how to prove to higher authorities that you are cooler.
Or find a similar job, get a job there and become a successful guy.
Or open your own similar business. Invest with your own money or take out a loan and success awaits you. You know better than him what to do, don't you?
Are you pulling some of this? Here is your answer.

Answer 7

at work, it is worth doing only one thing - to do the work that the management has assigned you. and then it's up to you to decide whether you like to do what your boss instructs. it is unlikely that your duties are driven by an assessment of his mental abilities.
ps I (given) once had a boss who demanded a comment on every line - I wrote a "comment generator" - he was delighted, loved me (such as time off, absenteeism, etc.) and always paid me bonuses.
pps and it is definitely not worth arguing with the authorities. write a report. and keep doing what you've been told to do. (at another job, I had a similar one - the "teamlead" did not perceive what he was told and bent his own - I wrote him proposals in the mail and a copy in a separate box, and once after another dressing about "nothing doesn't work" I sent all my notes to the director en masse. As a result, that guy was fired and I sat in his place. Although this company did not save and it also closed a year later,

Answer 8

If you see wrong actions on the part of the leader, then try to express your opinion and analysis to him in writing. List the pros and cons of both options. Perhaps you do not know everything that the leadership above instructed him. And there are reasons why it is necessary to do as he says. It is possible that you argue your point of view. But you can always and should offer your suggestions. They, too, can be adopted, albeit not immediately.
But if the leader is really inadequate, then it is better to really consider the option of changing jobs.