Is it really possible to become a tester or a programmer at the age of 36-40 if you have free time?

Question

Software testing

Hello everyone, I'm 36 years old, I've been working as a mechanic at a sewing company for 10 years, I'm thinking about getting a tower for promotion at my current job, a lot of free time (Japanese equipment, works well) - about 5 hours + about 4 hours after work. In my free time, out of boredom, I learned English to about an average level (I read books and bloggers / watch films almost without a dictionary), recently I came across the book "Songs about Pascal", tried it, practiced programming - quite an interesting lesson, I took Tanenbaum to read "Architecture computer" - also hooked, I also read in my spare time (between physics and algebra) '' A practitioner's guide to software test design'' by Lee Copeland, a wild thought crept in and why not try yourself in IT? age of course ... - already 36 years old, although there is a lot of free time, if you hire a mentor and study at work and at home for 8-9 hours a day, you can try to become a tester or programmer (which will work better) in 3-4 years, or learn 1c (I have a relative who is a programmer at 1c, promises to help in learning ) just wondering if anyone will take a 40 year old newcomer, or is it better to move in their specialty? Who has been working in IT for a long time, what do you think are the chances?

Answer 1

Realistically, there are only subtleties.
Firstly, testing is usually the most "black" and cheap work in this area.
Secondly, programming is like a sport: the earlier you start, the better the result. This does not mean that you will not succeed, just a lot can be given with noticeably more difficulty.
Thirdly, it is worth asking if there is a highly specialized programming problem in the already familiar area of ​​​​production of tasks. As in mechanical engineering - programming of CNC machines or robots, as well as automation on the PLC. If you learn something like this, you will have the advantage of experience. And on some web, you will be another complete newbie out of thousands.

Answer 2

Really.
Why do you think not? Like insanity and other age-related changes begin later.

Answer 3

I am almost 40, I have been successfully working as a web proger for 7 years! I studied myself. Dare))

Answer 4

Really. There are many such examples. But it all depends on your abilities. You will be able to eat information in three years and hone it with your hands, i.e. give 15-16 hours a day to a new profile? If so, then only your ability to write code will be important for the employer, at least there should be a portfolio of your work, completed and even better published.

Answer 5

In fact, if you typed into Google the query "Is it worth becoming a programmer at 40?", You would get a lot of positive responses from channels with a fairly large audience. I had similar doubts, because I'm only 11, where is it in IT. But I seem to be studying, and it also "clings" me.
... just wondering if anyone will take a 40 year old newcomer, or is it better to move in their specialty?
IMHO it is quite possible to work on freelance. After you feel that you have experience, you can head to the office. By the way, the first option can be like an additional job, because of which you can continue to work as a mechanic. To take, maybe, even small orders, in order to meet the deadlines, but it is interesting and useful.

Answer 6

Of course it's real

Answer 7

If with patience and desire order, then you can. It gets harder to learn as the years go by.

Answer 8

Become a tester, learn selenium + java, transfer to autotesters. And from there, if of course you want to be a programmer

Answer 9

Really, good luck! I would advise you to pay more attention to examples and documentation of a particular language, rather than to study huge Talmuds with a bunch of theory.

Answer 10

It seems to me that it is more realistic to become a programmer than a tester. There are few testers, there are many girls, there are many young people, these places are considered as a stepping stone to programming (i.e. temporary). The work itself is extremely tedious, the programmer is not much better in this regard. Main goal. Many young people who started programming early in good companies in the enterprise by the age of 30 set a goal - to become a boss and grow further, they have played enough. They understand well the pros and cons of working as a programmer. It's cool when you're cool and working for a cool company on something normal, otherwise... I don't recommend it.
https://youtu.be/VrEsICvkbT4
https://youtu.be/nIFClfBXuIQ

Answer 11

As they often say, if a man has not achieved anything by the age of 40, he will not achieve anything further. Are you ready to put up with the fact that a 25-year-old kid will poke you like a cat in a bowl? If in the future your position will require programming skills or understanding of this, then get this level of knowledge. Remove the pink veil from your eyes and work on and do what you can. It is better to be an expert in your field than to be nobody in a field that is currently in trend.

Answer 12

I know a man who started running at 70. He is now 92 and is a world champion in his age group. 10k run and half marathon.

Answer 13

Testing is difficult and you need to know where to look, know where there might be plugs, not to mention programming.
The biggest misconception is the type of clicked and done. Because there are certain tools, like postman, that it's better to know than not, a bunch of devices like mobile phones and tablets, performance reports, automated testing, and tons of all other types of specific frameworks in the team for testing ... Since this is more monotonous work than creative, etc. . That entry threshold can be very high in the case of developing a quality product. Otherwise, testing can be done by the developers themselves.
There is always a chance and you don't have to ask anything. If you are interested, then you just need to do this to know at least the basics, learn something, experiment somewhere, take the intricacies of the work of a particular team, offer your own solution to improve the process and reduce monotony, and most importantly, stop asking stupid questions like “can I ? on sites, as this is a question for yourself. And to ask, as for me, a more correct question, “do I want to?”.

Answer 14

Obviously, other things being equal, they will prefer you to be younger and with a technical tower.
However, I switched to testing at 35, with a liberal arts background and completely irrelevant work experience. Twice from scratch I quickly found a job. So if you have a head on your shoulders, an interest in the profession and a willingness to work and develop - it is quite real. The main thing - do not delay. If you are going to test - you definitely do not need 3-4 years.

Answer 15

Would a math education give you any advantage? For example, if you need to program for hardware, microcontrollers, etc., or do something in CAD?