Is Bootstrap going out of date?

Question

css

Recently I heard the opinion that Bootstrap is no longer relevant and is becoming a thing of the past. A person who seems to be knowledgeable should not talk nonsense. Actually there was a question how it is better to make up? There is one project that I will be working on for a long time, a large project that has many pages and requires adaptability, I don’t want to start from the wrong path, what should I do? Use bootstrap, or has something better/easier already appeared? Or write everything yourself?
Judging by the answers, I need to reformulate the question a little, what would you advise instead of bootstrap, more lightweight, you only need an adaptive grid and division by the most popular screen resolutions, there are such things as:
milk.ecm7.ru
getskeleton.com
neat.bourbon.io
www .profoundgrid.com
www.responsivegridsystem.com
Which of these would you recommend or suggest your options?

Answer 1

Well, what nonsense. Bootstrap is more alive than all the living and in general a new version of it is being prepared for release .
In addition, the main feature of today's bootstrap is modularity. When building a project through Grunt / Gulp, etc. you can choose which elements to connect. Many people use only Grid from it, as it is very convenient.
And in general, the most convenient thing for programmers. When you need to run an application, but there is no front-end developer or designer.

Answer 2

Less/Sass to help gentlemen. As I typed up large projects, I will also type up on bootstrap.
As for the opinions "not relevant" and "bootstrap for those who do not know how to typeset": If you do not understand the essence of the css framework as such, then why write such opinions. And I'm not only talking about bootstrap, but about all css frameworks.
When you try the framework itself in action, and not just download the minified compiled css file, then you will understand all the charm and you will not be able to typeset differently.
Less/Sass is not just css and in a couple of minutes you will not be able to understand all the delights. Try at least Less with bootstrap (it's simpler than Sass, although in my opinion Sass is more interesting and thoughtful), turn off the ones you don't need, use "variables", use mixins,
Good luck everyone.

Answer 3

Bootstrap is for those who do not know how to typeset. It's not an insult, it's its purpose. If you are not a coder, but you need to type something, then Bootstrap is the best choice, if you are a professional coder, then it is better not to use it.

Answer 4

Relevant, although due to increased popularity, various side effects have appeared (the more popular the product, the more fans and haters it has).
Use. Although it is not good for all cases, of course.

Answer 5

I agree with everything said above. Since I started using bootstrap, the development time of my projects has been reduced by at least 30%. Moreover, from the point of view of the customer, he absolutely does not care what tools you use, the main thing for him is the result and deadlines. Moreover, I started using bootstrap not because of a lack of experience in layout (not knowledge of css), but simply because I realized that it was easier with it. In addition, projects built on the bootstrap are easier to maintain in the future, especially if another program is taken for support. Most likely, he will even thank you that they made it up on the bootstrap =))
IMHO, those who say that the bootstrap is not comme il faut, most likely did not feel all the charm of this framework.

Answer 6

As a rule, bootstrap will fit perfectly in 90% of projects.
I see the pluses in the fact that if you use it wisely, then further support and expansion of the site will become easy and painless. Also, other layout designers will be able to connect to the project with minimal time costs if they know Bootstrap at a good level. Nobody bothers to edit the basic styles of bootstrap: change, supplement, delete, rewrite. The main thing here is the principle of modules, using bootstrap correctly, in theory, you yourself should start writing 'modular' code that will be easy to transfer to any place. Of course, you can write something similar yourself from scratch, for a specific project, but why reinvent the wheel?
The problem I see is that most of our layout designers (at least the ones I meet) cannot use anything other than a grid in bootstrape. Up to 10 times I had to apply for a freelance exchange about bootstrap layout. I chose customers of different price categories and not once did the performer use bootstrap even by 60-70%. Everyone uses only the grid, write their own mobile menu (including JS), tabs, pagination, even use their own classes for buttons, in fairly simple projects.
My conclusion is that for myself at the moment I will use bootstrap in most projects. And if a person cannot decide for himself whether he needs it or not, I recommend taking a maximum of 1-2 hours of time and reading the bootstrap documentation. During this time, you will find a more intelligible answer for yourself than you hear here.

Answer 7

getuikit.com is a great thing, much richer in components.

Answer 8

Bootstrap is good at assembling a project on the knee in a time constraint.
He didn't die, but the 15 minutes of fame has already passed.

Answer 9

You have more confidence, use what you know better, if you only need a grid, take only a grid from bootstrap:
getbootstrap.com/customize
Skeleton is also not bad if nothing but a grid is required, but what's the point?