IP contract for computer maintenance. Are there any flaws with the so-called. performer?

Question

System administration

Hello.
There are probably experienced system administrators here who have been successfully working for themselves for a long time. This is my first contract as an individual entrepreneur, I previously worked on a salary and under gray schemes. Are there any flaws from the performer's point of view?
Any critique from an argumentative point of view is welcome. Thank you!
The treaty itself

Answer 1

I will try to convey the idea of ​​what exactly you need. It's not certain that it will work. Let's start simple.
The contract must contain the MAXIMUM AMOUNT of DAMAGE provided for in this contract. Let's suppose you put up a sum of 15,000 for maintenance. You don't want to be charged with half a million later for a burned-out server? Want to answer for a large amount? Make the contract more expensive!
The contract must contain the priority of applications. Suppose there are 2 applications. One from the chief engineer about the fact that the Word on his computer does not work. And the second is that the file hosting from the secretary does not work. You rush to process the second one, and the Chief Engineer is very angry). As a result, the client left.
The contract must contain a clear number of hours. Overpaid per hour. Or unlimited, but more expensive! Or even hourly. But then the hour is expensive. This is called the contract menu.

Answer 2

IP contract for computer maintenance. Are there any flaws with the so-called. performer?

The contract is pure neighing. It can be seen that it was made by a person who has no idea what a contract is.
In fact, everything is simple - at first we agreed.
Then we drew up the key points of the oral agreements on paper.
Clearly, clearly, without tautology, and clearly to the point.
It is better to draw up a lawyer, you can do it yourself, but give it to a lawyer for verification.
Also, one should not forget that a contract is an agreement between at least two persons, and it must suit both parties, otherwise it will simply not be signed.
Just think what kind of idiot would sign such a mess?
You have there for the most part tautology and nonsense.
"The price of the Contract is" - who cares how much you paid for drawing up the contract? And why drag this information into the contract?

The contract price is fixed

Yah? And is it soft?

The price of the Agreement includes remuneration and compensation for the costs of the Contractor,

It turns out that all the costs and remuneration to the performer were paid to the person who drew up the contract?

Services are transferred by the Contractor to the Customer

Do you know how to transfer services? Seriously?

The terms of this Agreement are binding on the successors of the Parties

Yah?

This Agreement is made in two copies, having the same legal force.

What is legal power measured in? Also in newtons?

The agreement is a subscription agreement

It is up to the court to decide how to classify this contract.

The contractor has the right to receive payment for properly rendered services

Oh really?

An act sent by e-mail is considered received by the Customer and the period for its consideration begins to be calculated from the moment it is received in electronic form.

Cool.